Statements like this really define the idiocy of terrorists

Yeah, ah.. Ok.

I'm pretty much speechless here. Last I checked, Hezbollah was a terrorist organization. They are not entitled to anything.

Declaration of war.... I've never had a longer, harder laugh. At least these idiots are only waring with themselves this time instead of lobbing rockets at innocent Jewish kids.

 

Officially, Hezbollah isn't a terroristic organization but, yeah... That's so dumb.

 

Officially, if you are an American, then our government has declared Hezbullah a terrorist organization. See here the list is only a month old:

http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/08/103392.htm

 

Interesting list. It seems that by definition, USA is terrorism-free

 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=qkN8PvXZOeY&feature=related

HEZBOLLAH FOREVER

Last time i checked, terrorist organizations do not build hospitals, schools, roads and feed poor people.

 

That is a list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. So, yeah, they are all foreign. The US also has domestic terrorist groups.

It is good to see you support Hezbullah with words here on DP, but do you support them with your time or money or what?

Building a hospital is good, but does not absolve one for their terrorist acts. I don't expect you to understand something simple like that.

 

You wouldn't think so by the amount of legislation being put into effect to subvert civil liberties in the name of preventing domestic terrorism.

Our government also wants us to believe that Saddam was involved in 9/11, and Iraq had WMDs. Oh yeah, until last fall, they wanted us to believe that Iran was very close to nuclear capability.

But this is the same government that won't charge Bin Laden with 9/11, is making no attempt to capture him, and let him go at Tora Bora.

Gimme a break. When I want knowledge or honesty, the last place I will consult is the AIPAC branch of the government.

 

Describe terrorist attack.

I do not understand how you say bombing hiroshima with a nuke is not a terrorist attack but lobbing a rocket into Israel in retaliation of bombing Beirut is??

 

The US built roads, hospitals, schools, and feed the Japanese you still call them terrorists.

Your hypocrisy rises to new levels daily.

 

So it's ok to nuke people if you occupy their country afterwards and rebuild it?

Did they replace the thousands and thousands of lives lost?

You're one sick puppy if you think you can justify the murder of innocent civilians.

 

That was her position, not mine. I do not think building a hospital absolves one of being a terrorist, she does.

 

Nope, i didn't say that. You think dropping a nuke and killing 10's of thousands of people is OK though. Whacko!

 

"In contrast, the United States, Israel, and four other countries consider Hezbollah wholly or partly a terrorist organization. The European Union does not list Hezbollah as a "terrorist organization",[37] but does list the late Imad Mugniyah, a senior member and founder of Hezbollah, as a terrorist."

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah


So I guess that pretty much sums it up..

 

6 Countries all together (what a surprise that they are all close allies). The world has over 100 countries, therefore if we use the numbers against each other round it up and use logic Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization

 

Do you think that bombing civilian cities is terrorism?

 

You are joking right? How old are you anyway, 9?

Can you ever stick to one thread at a time? You're taking about Islams in the Hiroshima Moonbat thread, and Nukes in the Hezbullyah is a terrorist org thread.

Get your head screwed on straight or just stay out of the conversation entirely.

The irony here is that 60+ years from now Iraq and the US will be as good a friends at Japan have become. It's amazing, when you strain the shit out of the equation everything else just falls into place.

 

Here's another person that cannot stick to one thread at a time.... Gee, if that isn't a loaded question comparing oranges to flea turds, figuratively at that.

 

Care to answer the question Jeremy?

Do you think that bombing civilian cities is terrorism?

 

I'm not taking the bait. It's an impossible question to answer, because whatever answer I give will be wrong in the eyes of the irrational, irresponsible and incomprehensible.

 

It's because one is us and the other is someone else.

No really, I think that's about the extent to the logic.

The most basic principle of right & wrong is that you must apply the same standards to yourself that you apply to others. We simply do not do that.