he is not throwing rocks / firing rockets / doing terror attacks on the hand that feed him / doing terror attacks on civilians / calling to destruction of USA...
Sure. That was a threat to Iran so Israel did a favour to Iran! Cmmon! Do I look that stupid to you? Why do you always avoid to dispute facts I post? You came to Palestine, expelled 700,000 Palestinians and stole their land. It's a fact. You may call me a liar as many times as you like but it won't change that fact. Sorry but can you explain why he would call to destruction of US or fire rockets on someone? Did you understand at all what iul wanted to say?
you are lying again. we didn't came to Palestine. Jordan attacked us first in Six Days War, should i remember you this? so we didn't came, they forced us to come. and they lost. and in the 10000 time: their problem!
without getting in much argument over who attacked first, losing a war does not give a right to own a land according to international law (as I know Israel is a member of UN), its still called occupied land and this gives the right to its people to fight the occupier. The last country (before Israel) who claimed to own a land by winning a war ( or conquest) was the Nazi Germany.
Jordan attacked us first - it's a fact. tell me why we stole the land, if we were here before the Arabs and we have been expelled from here?
by now you should know that you should provide proof for your claims, if you do not know how, really its simple, see the example below: Imad (me) says that Israel attacked first in 1967. I know, this alone is not enough.and your next post after this will be "stop lie!" Imad knows in advance, that somebody, somewhere will say, you are a liar, so Imad does not wait that somebody to say so, and provide proof, its better if the proof was something reliable, unbiased, not wikipedia or cartoons, even better if the proof was an admitting from the side that claims the opposite, Imad then posts his proof(s): "I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent to The Sinai would not have been sufficient to launch an offensive war. He knew it and we knew it." Yitzhak Rabin, Israel's Chief of Staff in 1967, in Le Monde, 2/28/68 "Moshe Dayan, the celebrated commander who, as Defense Minister in 1967, gave the order to conquer the Golan...[said] many of the firefights with the Syrians were deliberately provoked by Israel, and the kibbutz residents who pressed the Government to take the Golan Heights did so less for security than for the farmland...[Dayan stated] 'They didn't even try to hide their greed for the land...We would send a tractor to plow some area where it wasn't possible to do anything, in the demilitarized area, and knew in advance that the Syrians would start to shoot. If they didn't shoot, we would tell the tractor to advance further, until in the end the Syrians would get annoyed and shoot. And then we would use artillery and later the air force also, and that's how it was...The Syrians, on the fourth day of the war, were not a threat to us.'" The New York Times, May 11, 1997 Menahem Begin had the following remarks to make: 'In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian Army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.' "Noam Chomsky, "The Fateful Triangle." "The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan; one does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today. But the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concern of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them." David Ben-Gurion, in 1936, quoted in Noam Chomsky, "The Fateful Triangle." see.. simple like this
let's say that we attacked Egypt first, although it's not true because of the sequence of events that before the war. Jordan joined to the war and attacked us first, they lost, and we conquered Judea and Samaria. about the Golan Heights: you know that in the years 1948-1967 the Syrians bombed the settlements in Israel daily from the Golan heights?
He should know them better than me as both are Israeli prime ministers, I m not asking if they are lying to their wives about committing adultery, my question was obvious regarding the attack of 1967, I already quoted Dayan above, but was wondering, is what he said was a lie?