That site is very strict. I do know people who actually invented a planning process who were banned because of their rules. Like any site, it really needs to be just one source of information for any research process. Jim
I had a lot information in there that would be useful to anyone interested in the integrity of online poker. Previous poker scandals that have been documented in poker history + how sites work to prevent rigging etc. I feel critics over at wiki were just being difficult. And thats my unbias opinion
Wikipedia links are nofollow and won't boost your SERPs at all. It'll provide some nice targetted traffic though. You'll be better editing existing articles and adding a new paragraph here or there.