Larry Silverstein AKA 'The Butcher' faces tough questions

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Rankhyips, Apr 1, 2008.

  1. #1
    Rankhyips, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  2. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #2
    What is the big deal? It is a video bunch of idiots interrupting and yelling and screaming and you think that makes Silverstien look bad. Nope, just makes all you conspiracy nuts look even crazier.

    As for filling his pockets - you mean because he had insurance on the building, like every building owner has. Seriouly, you just embarass yourself posting this.

    I rarely watch youtube links from DP. This one I decided to check out. Only a fool would think that made Silverstien look bad.
     
    browntwn, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  3. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #3
    Whoa, whoa, whoa. Slow down there Sally Ann. Don't make me lecture you on conspiracies, ok?
     
    guerilla, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  4. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #4
    $ilver$tein is rotton to the core. :mad:
     
    AGS, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  5. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #5
    Perhaps I should have said 9-11 conspiracy nuts. Is that better?

    You have made your point. You have doubts and feel there is not enough information for you to decide one way or the other. I think that is a cop out - but you are free to come to that conclusion.

    I, on the other hand, have no such doubts. I am 100% sure the buildings were hit by airplanes and that is what caused their collapse.

    You can't seriously think this video proved anything? It was just a bunch of people yelling questions at Silverstein. How does that prove or disprove anything? How does that help you resolve any doubt one way or the other.

    Honestly, did that video aid you in anyway?
     
    browntwn, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  6. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #6
    What is your problem with him? That he collected insurance on the attack? Cause he's Jewish? Seriously, why such animus toward him?
     
    browntwn, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  7. soniqhost.com

    soniqhost.com Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,887
    Likes Received:
    96
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #7
    One of the conspiracy theories around there is that the jews knew 9-11 was going to happen, you think that Larfy Silverstein would of got the memo and would of not bought the building a month prior to the attack on them.
     
    soniqhost.com, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  8. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #8
    I think We Are Change could channel their energy in more productive directions. And they are not exclusively 9/11 truthers.

    Thank you. There is not only not enough information, there is conflicting information.

    I don't know how else to say this, but you are a fool. The designer of the WTC made a big deal for years about how the towers were built specifically to withstand such an attack. Professors, engineers and others have questioned the science, as well as the Army Corps. of Engineers for their investigation and the science used to explain the collapse. It simply doesn't add up.

    In fact, to be honest with you, I do know that the official 9/11 story is BS. I just don't know what that means as far as guilt.

    If you don't question the official story, you haven't done any research on it. I mean, for crissakes, someone shorts the airlines just before? Politicians get warnings not to fly? One of the Hijackers father says he spoke to him a day later? None of the hijackers appear on the passenger manifests? The plane that went down in PA (?), there was almost no wreckage left, it didn't even look like a plane had crashed from the amount of destruction to the terrain and wreckage.

    Coincidentally interceptors were stood down or on training for 2 hours?

    Have you seen the footage of Building 7 coming down? It would be like punching you in the face and AGS getting a bloody nose. It just falls for no reason.

    So sorry, but if you have looked into it, and you don't have questions, you're thicker than a brick IMO.

    No, it didn't aid me. I already saw it. I considered checking out W.A.C. but they come off as a bunch of nutjobs. I'm not saying they are, but that is how they come off.

    Although the confrontation of David Rockefeller in NY is pretty damn cool.
     
    guerilla, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  9. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #9
    Whatever religion he is doesn't make any difference at all. He is an utter scumbag.Don't try and play the BS Jew "trump card" because I don't buy any of that crap. :rolleyes:
     
    AGS, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  10. Rankhyips

    Rankhyips Banned

    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    My doubts about 911 began at the very moment I saw building 7 collapse. I'm not a professional, but when I see a METAL CONSTRUCTION collapse the way it collapsed, there's something terribly wrong. What more do you need?
    Patriotism and blindness are synonyms.

    As for filling his pockets, he insured the buildings 6 weeks before the inside job happened and it was covered specifically against "terrorist attacks". 6 weeks!

    Of course, he belongs to that specie "who suffered terribly in the past", the only "humans" able to profit from mass-murdering. And profitable, it sure was.

    Seriously, you just embarrass yourself posting this.
     
    Rankhyips, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  11. soniqhost.com

    soniqhost.com Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,887
    Likes Received:
    96
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #11
    Please answer this about building 7 Why destroy a building not involved in the terrorist attack. If you believe its an inside job then you can say the Twin Tower were taken down to sell the Show but what do they gain by taking down building 7?

    As for insuring it against a terrorist attack, its not like the building wasn't attacked by terrorist before as for the timing out if, he only bought the building a month before the attacks.
     
    soniqhost.com, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  12. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #12
    You need to do some reading about what exactly was in WTC7, then you will realise why your lover Larry had to PULL the building. ;)
     
    AGS, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  13. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #13
    AGS, maybe you know this. I could have swore that I read or saw in a video, that within 10 minutes of the Towers being hit, the media was already blaming Al Queda. IIRC, there is a clip from a major network saying it was Al Queda, before the buildings had even reached the ground.

    Sound right to you?
     
    guerilla, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  14. Rankhyips

    Rankhyips Banned

    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Building 7 was the place where investigatory documents for Enron, Worldcom, Adelphia and many other companies were kept as well as large numbers of case files for ongoing investigations by the SEC (3,000 to 4,000) and the EEOC (45 cases).

    I suspect (personal opinion, no evidence) the building served as the control room where the bombs were detonated.

    If you don't have a reason to go to war, you make up one. If at the same time you can get rid off corporate fraud documents done by the same happy few - friends helping each other at the top - and fill your pockets at the same time. Well, that's a great business deal. Who cares about only 3,000 casualties for all that easy money?

    The butcher took control of the lease of all WTC buildings on July 24, 2001. Perfect timing.


    If you're right, they were the first METAL CONSTRUCTIONS in history that collapsed due to fire (WTC 7 was a minor fire), collapsing at the speed of free fall. I like to point to the kink in the middle of the roof at the moment the collapse began, just like it happens with a controlled demolition.

    Strangely enough, building 3, 4, 5 & 6 were severely damaged but didn't collapse.

    You know, today 90% of Europeans still don't know about building 7. People laugh at you when you say 3 buildings collapsed in NY. The media didn't cover it here. You had to watch CNN or check the internet to know it. I wonder why?

    Here is a video of a Dutch controlled demolition expert:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgoSOQ2xrbI

    Patriotism is a governmental program imposed as soon as you can walk. The 911 event shows why it's important. It makes people blind.
     
    Rankhyips, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  15. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #15
    Sounds right to me buddy.

    The mantra was already in place mate, within 24 hours the f**kers had already wrapped the mystery up, including the list of hijackers. No questions asked it was Al Queda. It was true too because it was on the TeeeeeeeeeeVeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. :D

    Now if you cast your mind back to the 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on Saturday 30 June 2007 where 2 incompetent idiots tried to do a literal "fly drive" at Glasgow, Scotland there was nothing for a few days whilst the authorities tried to put together exactly what happened. 9/11 was wrapped up within 24 hours. :rolleyes:

    I honestly cannot believe how stupid some of the public are for not even questioning it.
     
    AGS, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  16. mythbuster08

    mythbuster08 Peon

    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Not really. WTC7 IS covered, but usually only in documetaries about the conspiracy theories in the US. But since these theories aren't really taken for truth here, not many people watch these. We as europeans are quite simple minded. The gross majority simply believes that Armstrong was the man on the moon, that JFK was shot by LHO and that Marilyn Monroe commited suicide. But in general we don't really care what americans think about these topics, because we have more important problems today to be taken care of.

    If somebody tells you, that two passenger trains collided and several hundred people were killed and a parked car was destroyed, will you think about the parked car later?
     
    mythbuster08, Apr 1, 2008 IP
  17. pingpong123

    pingpong123 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,080
    Likes Received:
    117
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #17
    Hmmm isnt that what they call in black-ops a " Cover story"?;)
    Wow, they sure were quick to get all of their evidence within hours to know who attacted werent they;)
     
    pingpong123, Apr 2, 2008 IP
  18. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #18
    There's the actual news report floating around youtube somewhere. IIRC, you can see a tower smoking, and they are talking about Al Queda. I mean, in order to say that, they would have had to have taken responsibility for the attack while it was still going on.
     
    guerilla, Apr 2, 2008 IP
  19. Rankhyips

    Rankhyips Banned

    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    It wasn't covered on the Belgian TV-news, I remember very well.

    Back in January, I was at a friends place and we were discussing 911 with 7 or 8 other people. After he said that 19 Arabs and Binny Laden did it, I felt the unstoppable desire to add my version of the story...

    It was quite amusing. They were all laughing/mocking when I said 3 buildings collapsed and I had to examine my head. I then asked if I could use his internet and showed him a video. He replied that this building indeed looked like it was brought down by a controlled demolition but it had nothing to do with 911.

    He's not really the sharpest tool in the box and since the wine was great I didn't insist, but it shows how easy the average masses adopt a BS-story. Only when their TV (mind) tells them it didn't happen the way they've been told, they will believe it.

    I guarantee, if you ask around, 90% don't know about WTC7, at least where I live.
     
    Rankhyips, Apr 2, 2008 IP
  20. mythbuster08

    mythbuster08 Peon

    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    If you haven't seen something yet, it does not necessarily mean that it does not exist.
    Here in Germany I remember the last doc on this must be around 2 years ago.

    Do they know about the destruction of the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church? Probably not. Who cares? AFAIK nobody was killed in WTC7. So why should this building be of any interest to anybody (except the owner)?
    I think that before 9/11 99% of all non Americans (non New Yorkers?) thought that WTC only consists of TWO buildings. I did!
     
    mythbuster08, Apr 2, 2008 IP