The **REAL** Threat to World Peace - Religions Extremism (read if you watched Fitna)

There is much to condemn everywhere, and no one came out unscathed, morally. Just a sad chapter for our species.

 

Great post, I agree with you! Because God is One and One is All!

It's the details that tear everything apart

 

The stupid view is that the holocaust didn't happen.
The ignorant view that the holocaust did happen but few died
The evil view is that the holocaust didn't happen but it needs to

What part of the UN had any interest in keeping Muslims out Israel?

Why is it that only Muslims have a hard time getting into Israel to enjoy the holy sites?

What are the other religions doing that the Muslims aren't?

Hmmm odd. Seems that not just Jews can own land in Israel. I wonder if any of the Muslims that are firing rockets into Israel have ever considered just, you know, walking through the front door and buying a house.

 

Let this post take you back to reality:

Umm, because everyone just loves to live in a place where there is extreme racism and they are treated like dogs?

 

source : http://www.the-zionist.com/3.html

Zionists against Christianity :

The LOVING GOD?

Every Christian laymen have been told by the Churches, that , Jesus in company with his "Father" is the LOVING GOD .

This is a very noble gesture by the Christian Theology by giving Jesus and his "father" such a remarkable feature.

This is a standpoint which can not be fully rejected either if you consider the love of the "terrible God" to the Childeren of Israel. But this standpoint is also very indiscriminate and does ignore the very fundamentals of the Bible.

If we talk to a Zionist scholar, he/she might give us a more precise and differentiated account about the " Loving God" in the Bible.

Why is this?

It is just because the Jews generally and the Zionists especially would not be blind followers of the "Loving God " theory because they are alway aware that the term the "Loving God" can only be conditionally right about the God of Israel in his LOVE to them, the Jews only..

The Zionists are very proud that their God is only "Loving God" who loves only them and never everthe non-Jews. This is for the Jews and Zionists the very pillar of their religious believes , which is very much substantiated by the Bible.

For the Christian Theologists the term the "Loving God" is just a term invented by the Church for the sake of competition with Islam.

After the Christian Churches has learned about Islam and the very first title abiout God in Islam ( Al Rahmaan and al- Raheem ) , they were "forced" to make this invention which goes against the very fundamentals of the Bible. We shall remember here about the Exodus 4-12 , Deuteronomy , Math. 7, 10, 17 which does make the term "Loving God " a complete mockery if the love of the God in the Bible was to be applicable to Jew as well to non-Jews.

But why talking about every thing so theoretically.

Let us ask the God of Israel and his son directly what they would tell us about their love to the non-Jews.

The following passages would give us a clear answer to the question if the God of Israel and his son are unconditionally a Troika of the LOVING GOD?

The Bible Talking about the non-Jews: Exodus (2nd book of Mose):23,27ll send my terror ahead of you and throw into confusion every nation you encounter. I will make all your enemies turn their backs and run. 28 I will send the hornet ahead of you to drive the Hivites, Canaanites and Hittites out of your way.

Deutronomy (5 th book of Mose)2,25 This very day I will begin to put the terror and fear of you on all the nations under heaven.hey will hear reports of you and will tremble and be in anguish because of you.

How on earth can this Terrorist God be able to love Non-Jews?

Who on earth would this terrorist behaviour suit to the philosophy of the alleged "loving God" and the teaching of "Turn the other cheek" if Jesus is the incarnated God/ the son of God


The above is a clear indication of relations between the Master Tramp and his so callede disciples.

This is an indisputable prove of a loose tramp relation between the 13 Zionists, who were occasionally together in order to defend themselves from dogs and other wild animals and not as the Christian Churches claims because of group of people with strict hierarchy under the respective leadership of Jesus.

 

You must have me confused with someone you can censor.

 

You can't hold back in fear of reds. You will get them anyway. Even if one doesn't do anything wrong.
You can only feel pity for those who think that their measly red rep and provocative comment will mean the end of the world for the recipient.

The sad thing, is that it means the end of the world for some recipients ......

 

You are making me sick again.
of course there is a different between the 60 million victims of the war to the 6 million Jews. The Jews murdered just because they were Jews. they didn't die in combats, they didn't die in bombings, all of those are part of the war. they murdered all over Europe just because they were Jews. even Christians that their great grandfather was Jew murdered.

 

You do Islam a great service, Thraxed, truly, and really help dispel the myth of Muslims as freaks in the eyes of those predisposed that way. Between your consideration of women having the worth of demi-humans, and your gross disdain for Jews, as people - you know, the folks that share your genetic imprint, like all of us - you have really made a great contribution. Congrats!

It's just sad. So much hatred, and it goes "both" ways. Jews hating Muslims, Muslims hating Jews (and no, no order imputing "who hates more", please), all hating all, when we all just walk and breathe.

 

I agree with this sentiment. It would be nice if the poster making it actually believed it. The inconsistency is regrettable.

 

I'd say I'd like to say this ranks as the most disgusting post in DP history, but unfortunately I've seen plenty. This view sure smells like the fetid swamp of evil that it is, though. It is indeed rank and unfit for human consumption.

 

I didn't mean that as an insult, it is true, because the majority of the Jews live in the US.

we've been over the women thing before. They get many many more rights than they do in the west.

 

The majority of Jews lives in USA.. it's true.. so what? the Jews are not the majority of USA, so the this country is not the Jews country.

 

We can discuss "women's rights" generally, another time.

I am referring to your view that a women's testimony in rape cases is, following from Sura 2:282, indeed worth half that of man, which you seem to ascribe to some inherent predisposition to "untrustworthiness" in women - here, in the example of their own rape. So, literally, "demi-human," following apparently from your notions above, or below:

The estimated population of Jews in the United States in 2006 was about 5.25 million, out of something like 300 million U.S. population in 2006; or about 1.75% Jewish. Not exactly a tidal wave majority, is it?

 

Indeed. I was hopping up and down in front of my computer yelling "Liar, liar, pants on fire!"

 

The poster includes other issues from other threads in his attempt to divert attention away from his support elsewhere for censorship, while stating here a sentiment that supports free speech.

It appears he would like to revisit those issues. For any interested, please see the constitutional discussions, for example:

Whether a support for segregation, based on race, ethnicity, country of origin, religion:

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=390357&page=49 (et seq. - warning - long. If interested in the constitutionality at issue, please PM or just ask)

Or misrepresenting the Framers' intent with respect to the constitutionality of religion and state (characterizing this poster's reliance on the Framers' words as:

among other things, as well as a collectivist smear of what "atheists believe," (please see http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=7142645&postcount=13) though the poster regularly decries collectivism in all forms). Turning to those Framers; please see http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=770815; http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=7142199&postcount=11; http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=7142519&postcount=12; http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=7143881&postcount=15

and so forth.

Or, here, as I mentioned, his support for the censorship of free speech in one context, while condemning it in another.

does not exist in the same universe as:

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=772167&page=3

It is regretful that a substantive discussion on such inconsistencies has led the poster to call this poster, among other things, and among other people, simple-minded, fanatical, etc.

 

Sorry, Wisdom - I'm missing your point - can you please explain a bit more?