Short URL vs Long URL?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by $earner, Mar 11, 2008.

  1. #1
    What's better for SEO, a short URL or a long URL?
    The problem I have is that some elements in my site are really deep into the hierarchy, like:
    http://www.example.com/Category/Subcategory/subcategory/

    Having this amount of hierarchical levels allows me to have a neat distribution of content. Also, each level is keyword rich and allows anyone who sees the URL to know instantly how it works, but I'm a little concerned that having a long URL can affect my ranking when I get indexed.

    Thank you very much for your time.
     
    $earner, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  2. zakk

    zakk Peon

    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    In terms of the actual domain, I would choose short every time - Make it easy to remember, sure stuff a keyword or two in there but don't sacrifice this for catchy and memorable.

    Once you have the short domain I wouldn't worry about how long some of your pages are, this is a great way to get your more specific keywords for their pages in there. I really think Google's going to care more about the keywords than the length.
     
    zakk, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  3. adityaw

    adityaw Peon

    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    It does not matter with Google, but you might have problem with Yahoo! or MSN. I believe I read this on seomoz.org
     
    adityaw, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  4. princess.donna

    princess.donna Peon

    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    i prefer short url.. it's easier for the visitors to remember the website
     
    princess.donna, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  5. MarketExpert

    MarketExpert Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #5
    Long url with keywords is better for SEO. Short url is better for type in traffic.
     
    MarketExpert, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  6. $earner

    $earner Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #6
    Thanks a lot for the answers, I hope not to have any problem with this, because I wouldn't like to change this.

    Cheers!
     
    $earner, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  7. dpking

    dpking Peon

    Messages:
    1,021
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Google dnt care about the link depth (i.e. the number of slashes in your permalink won’t matter) So provide search engines with something good and related to the page.
     
    dpking, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  8. seopigeon

    seopigeon Banned

    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Use long or small url, but target good keywords
     
    seopigeon, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  9. anie_b

    anie_b Peon

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    In the general context long urls are more difficult to type rather than the short url and the longer they get there are chances of more errors. Users can remember the short urls easily rather than the long urls and even can type it by themselves. Search engine may give some preference to the longer urls when it could find keword in it.
     
    anie_b, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  10. $earner

    $earner Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #10
    I'm so glad to hear that, thank you!!
     
    $earner, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  11. Shazz

    Shazz Prominent Member

    Messages:
    8,395
    Likes Received:
    453
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    330
    #11
    Short, word more used really depends
     
    Shazz, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  12. Bloomtools

    Bloomtools Peon

    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Bloomtools, Mar 11, 2008 IP
  13. Nystul

    Nystul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,077
    Likes Received:
    40
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #13
    definitely go for short URL with keywords attached.
     
    Nystul, Mar 12, 2008 IP
  14. govindseo

    govindseo Banned

    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    i am totally agree with you. right answer.:cool:
     
    govindseo, Mar 12, 2008 IP
  15. $earner

    $earner Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #15
    $earner, Mar 12, 2008 IP
  16. Pixelrage

    Pixelrage Peon

    Messages:
    5,083
    Likes Received:
    128
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Pixelrage, Mar 12, 2008 IP
  17. $earner

    $earner Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #17
    $earner, Mar 12, 2008 IP
  18. larssonk22

    larssonk22 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #18
    Try not to make such a deep directories. Thats 2 levels deep which means its harder for spiders to reach.

    When you are "keyword" are you using the same keyword over and over again??? Thats blatent spamming.
     
    larssonk22, Mar 12, 2008 IP
  19. $earner

    $earner Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #19
    Well, that was an example. The majority of content is two levels deep.
    And no, I'm not using the same keyword over and over again. I have a taxonomy structure there.
     
    $earner, Mar 12, 2008 IP
  20. MarketExpert

    MarketExpert Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #20
    MarketExpert, Mar 12, 2008 IP