Hey guys, I currently run a teen website and I'm working on the video section. I added a "sexy" category, but I'm trying to decide where to draw the line between just "sexy" and "adult/porn". My member base is primarily 13-20, so I don't want to have adult content. Give me your thoughts please!
clothes on = fine bikinis/cleavages = some places at least 16 gotten poor/ no $ to buy top/bottoms = adult
give me all your videos first and then i will give you my suggestion but first i need to see them all....
Kaung made a solid point with definitions: Clothes on, is fine. No clothes, hmhmhm, you know... thats in the line.
So underwear, thongs, being topless (but the important parts being covered by their hands or blurred out), etc. would all be not considered adult?
Say that anything in underwear, racy bathers or less is to far, as is any action that could be considered sexually suggestive by a reasonable, normal person.
Definately nothing where private parts are showing. Although I always thought it was funny that in many countries people are allowed to have sex once 16 but can't watch it till they're 18.
You wanna enjoy the adult content without paying? There is a thin line that demarcates the sexy content from the adult/porn content. A nude figure in normal posture may be sexy but in an inviting posture may be considered as porn. The age of the visitors too play a great role. Teens definitely will have adult taste than sexy one. Hence tread carefully
Hi, I think context of how it is used makes a difference an location. I agree with all the above comments. But a also saw the movie Titanic full frontal an only a PG13 Rating. If I were you I would stay with clothed people. Best Sami