just keep doing it the test. algorithm is all about numbers. while statistic and average can give some good indication on how formula can be made. combine those two with enough research data you can have pretty good estimate at least for references purposed but not to predict the right algorithm. so well done and keep us posted when you have tested more data.
I heard if you eat the strawberry in the middle of the screen before it disappears that's an extra 200 points. Also, if you eat one of the power-pills it turns all the ghosts blue and you can eat them for 100, 200, 400 and 800 points respectively.
i think in the last line is 5,331,038. At least those are my calculations. Sometimes i get decimals. LOL, find a job man! web is very boring for you!
Seems pretty darn accurate to me. I have always been told Pagerank works in a "points" or "totalled" type scheme which takes into account every backlink, even PRless backlinks. Good Work.
I doubt that google is using so simple formula for calculating... anyways good efforts... atleast this method is near to actual PR for my blogs.... --Ashish
Good point Vlad Nice attempt to the OP but it will take more than this to work out Googles NEW and updated (from previous patented formula) PR algos
hey does it not depend upon the keyword you are getting page rank i saw induforum.com its pr5 and when checked through google its having 45 links only
thats because the links are from pages with a high pagerank, for the 1000th time, its not only the number of links but how important those links are! and i think you are thinking of SERP and not pagerank, keywords have nothing to do with the pagerank of ur page
its something that must be called a crap table...there's no specific quantity to achieve certain value of PR...its all up to Google's calculation...
its something that must be called a crap table...there's no specific quantity to achieve certain value of PR...its all up to Google's calculation...
it might not be accurate but it just displays how big the difference between each PR is similar to the Richter scale...a 3.0 much much muchh stronger than a 2.0 earthquake...