In other words "Not all Americans are cruel to dogs" No offence but some should do understand what is meant by "Not all Muslims are.." which they make a mockery out of.
Actually what I have seen to this time makes me think like this. I think their punishment will be like the haditha killings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haditha_killings nothing at all , an army that protects rapers and murderers won't charge a soldier that kills a little puppy. This was on a newsgroup I read and everybody was cursing that soldier. The only think they will do will some public brain washing.Shiny but empty.
No i never said the Iraqi's deserved anything. we shouldn't have anything to do with them. maybe my first statement was a bit exaggerated..
"Not all Muslims are..." has become almost like some courtesy disclaimer we are required to leave at the end of each statement, that refers to violence committed by Muslims. When speaking of Muslims, why do we have to continue to remind with each sentence, that not everyone is a terrorist? We all know that not all Muslims are...at this point. Am I doing the same thing in reverse? I guess I am. There were several threads made about the soldier throwing the dog. Some people would just say something like, "How cruel, I hate that guy!" That I could understand and agree with. But when people make comments like, "US troops are evil and love to kill helpless dogs." That I take exception with, because it is completely untrue. I can't defend that, it was wrong. I also believe that bombing a country and then dropping our soldiers on the ground to make friends afterwards is totally absurd.
never knew i could shedd tears for an animal but i just did thats fuc**d up... you saw the puppies face expression?