Does PR increases with time spent by visitors on my site?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by digitalduke, Feb 19, 2008.

  1. #1
    Hello

    I am still learning SEO and want to ask you guys a question.
    I apologize if it has been already.

    Does time spent by visitors on any page of website helps to boost PR? or it doesn't matter?

    Thanks in advance for your time

    Best Regards.
    digital duke
     
    digitalduke, Feb 19, 2008 IP
  2. amelia_seo

    amelia_seo Peon

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    hmmm i dont think so, maybe?
     
    amelia_seo, Feb 19, 2008 IP
  3. gr8liverpoolfan

    gr8liverpoolfan Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,719
    Likes Received:
    538
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #3
    Plainly speaking NO.

    Look at it from this POV. If your site manages to make the visitor stay for a longer time than normal, then chances are that he finds something interesting in it . Consequently, he may link to it from his site, and that could start a chain effect. With more backlinks coming your way, you get a boost in PR ;)
     
    gr8liverpoolfan, Feb 19, 2008 IP
  4. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    437
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    As gr8liverpoolfan, no. Only links pointing back to your individual pages will increase your page's PageRank score.

    Also note that I said page, not site. PageRank is calculated on a per-page basis, not a per-site basis.
     
    Dan Schulz, Feb 19, 2008 IP
  5. dylanphelan

    dylanphelan Active Member

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    91
    #5
    I read somewhere a week or two ago that there's been speculation, and yes, it may only be speculation... that Google may start to take visitor behaviour into account... It may have been a thread on here; I really don't remember.

    I think the theory was that if visitors spent longer on a page, that page had been more 'valuable' to that visitor.
    Also mentioned was that G is now able to monitor visitor behaviour much more now because of the widespread use of its tools.

    Anybody else heard anything like this?
     
    dylanphelan, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  6. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #6
    That is easy to answer, no. Not only would this open the doorway for "massive" abuse, it would be impossible to get relevant data over the hundreds of millions of people who use the web. There is not accurate way to track that data.
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  7. thunderbolt007

    thunderbolt007 Active Member

    Messages:
    851
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #7
    No. Traffic doesn't have direct connection with PR.....
     
    thunderbolt007, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  8. dylanphelan

    dylanphelan Active Member

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    91
    #8
    Yes, that is most definitely correct. I think I remember where I read about this - I seem to remember them having a few good points. I'll look it up again...
     
    dylanphelan, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  9. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #9
    There are no "good points", this idea would have to be a completely different ranking system than Pagerank, and in theory it is almost like Alexa minus the visiting time, and we all seen how respected Alexa "spyware" is.
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  10. MarketExpert

    MarketExpert Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #10
    Time does not effect PR, but can help rankings.
     
    MarketExpert, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  11. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #11
    No, visitor time does not effect search engine results.

    Where do you people come up with this stuff?
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  12. MarketExpert

    MarketExpert Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #12
    Oh. I misread the question. I meant age of the domain.
     
    MarketExpert, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  13. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #13
    The word "domain" and "age" aren't even in the thread title or thread orignal post, but nice try never the less. ;)
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  14. w3bmaster

    w3bmaster Notable Member

    Messages:
    17,594
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #14
    Ha ha :))

    Man don't be so confused PR is just a number nothing more and it;'s based on BACKLINKS

    SEO means rankings in SE not PR

    Regards
     
    w3bmaster, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  15. kenbrower

    kenbrower Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    28
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    120
    #15
    Part of the patent Yahoo recently filed includes talk about how google's algo can be improved upon by judging user behavior, which I assume would include how long people stay on the site, bounce rate etc.

    As far as I am aware, it is only in the talking phase, and I hope it stays there. The minute a company starts factoring in user behavior, people will immediately begin trying to game the system.
     
    kenbrower, Feb 20, 2008 IP
  16. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #16
    In a sense your right, but you forget the simple fact that Pagerank "is" a factor in Google search aglorthim and in the search results. What people mis-understand is it's not YOUR pagerank that is the factor, it's the pagerank (and relevancy + quality) of your backlinks to a specific web page.

    Really, what people need to say is your web pages Pagerank isn't a factor but your inbound links are, because most of the time Pagerank is achieved by having rich unique content with backlinks from trust sites. But amazing, in return these backlinks would give a higher Pagerank.

    Go figure ;)

    "End visible pagerank in 2008!"
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 20, 2008 IP