Just in: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22903977/ "Giuliani ran third in Florida, his best showing of the campaign, after spending most of his money and time in the state ahead of Super Tuesday. But it was not nearly good enough to make his last stand in a state that is home to tens of thousands of transplanted New Yorkers." By bye you fascist pig!
9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 Doh!!! It didn't work for AMERICA'S FAKE MAYOR.
Damn, RP can seem to siphon off any Republicans from those dropping out! So far, those that have dropped out have only managed to make it easier for RP to fight for last place, unchallenged
I have a feeling all of the resident Neocons will be supporting McCain shortly. The irony here is that the most important endorsement would have been Thompson, because Giuliani is like our resident Clinton fan, he's a RINO. Same as McCain. The bad news for Americans is, with a possible McCain-Clinton showdown, you can count on Amnesty. Which means say goodbye to the border, and be prepared to be overrun by immigrants which will tax the education and medical system to bankruptcy. Kudos to the neocon alliance! Fight'em in Iraq, so you can leave the back door open here.
If you though Gtech had a problem with 2nd or 3rd generation Americans, wait till what's coming next for him when the neocon gang takes the white house again.
That is 100% for sure mate, without any doubt, especially if that utter fraud Giuliani is backing him. Huck will hopefully drop out soon and then all is left for the neocons (apart from Insane McCain) is Car Salesman Romney, Timeshare seller Edwards, Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, each and every one of them are controlled puppets. Whichever way we look at it it ain't looking good mate. It's a neocon controlled love fest.
Are you disappointed that Jews might support McCain? Kinda proves my point about all the RP supporters not being real conservatives. They only migrated to the party to support a kooky libertarian from the liberal/progressive side. The recent poll about who RP supporters will support when RP doesn't win the nomination suggests this as well
Can we know which organization that Ron Paul supporters believe controls these "puppets?" Does it have anything to do with lizard people? I'm going to go out on a limb here, and suggest it probably isn't these guys that are controlling them, right?
More "Al Qaeda-inspired" fearmongering BS GTech. Make sure you look under your bed tonight because the boogeymen are coming! They hate you for your freedom!!!
Not at all. I'm sure he appeals to many Jews and Neocons. That's funny, because if you look up NeoConservatism at Wikipedia, that's the definition they use. We've already exposed that you are a former Democrat, who endorses the welfare state, now hiding out in the Republican party. What's patently obvious, is that you do not know what conservatism is. Because your personal domestic politics and foreign policy positions are not true to established Republican traditions. I don't put a lot of stock in forum polls. Maybe you do.
For Ron Paul and his supporters, there is no difference. Another dishonest assertion from guerilla. When cornered, whip out a lie to cover up for his liberal/progressive roots. Then you must believe your fellow RP supporters here are liars. That's a pretty amazing admission about those who have diligently defended your support for the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism. You certainly put a lot of stock in "straw polls"
Not so sure about that. Von Mises and Hayek are heroes of Paul's, and they were Jewish, but definitely not Neocons. If you can reconcile your positions with Mr. Republican, Robert Taft, and Mr. Conservative Barry Goldwater, then I might be able to take you seriously. I definitely support America. Absolutely. Straw polls are a sign of activist turnout. The majority of the voters are not party activists. You're gunna need to go back to the Democrats GTech. This revolution is taking the GOP back, just like Goldwater did in '64.
I believe everyone is now aware of how Ron Paul feels about Jews, with the exposure of his newsletters. I don't seek your approval. Anyone can drop names. I was not aware of that. I knew you definitely supported Iran, the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism. How do you reconcile that? Doesn't seem to be reflective of reality. No comment on your fellow RP supporters being liars? To take the position you did, you have to believe they are liars. That's a pretty low thing to say about those that have defended your support of countries and organizations whose stated goal is the destruction of the country you are currently living in. You're going to have to go back to the liberal democrats. The phony "revolution" has nothing in common with the GOP to take it back from. White supremacy, kooky conspiracy theories, blaming America first, giving aid and comfort to our enemies, dismantling America...are not part of the Republican party platform.
I'm pretty sure how he feels when his campaign manager and economic advisor in 1988 were both Jewish. I'm not trying to approve you. Wouldn't dream of it. Just surprised that your so-called Republican and Conservative positions are not reconcilable with Mr. Conservative and Mr. Republican. I support America! You mean the country of my birth? Of my mother's birth? No one wants to destroy it GTech, that's already happening if you pay attention to the news. We're on the verge of an economic collapse, and our country has gone completely backwards in the last 25 years. In 1980, we were the world's greatest creditor nation. We OWNED others. Today, we're the world's greatest debtor nation. People OWN us. Your war is very expensive, hopefully your grandchildren won't be working for the Chinese government in 2025, but hey, you'll probably be in Florida by then, soaking up all of the social security they can possibly be taxed to provide. I don't believe in the welfare state or big government as you do. That makes me totally incompatible with the liberal democrats. I favor NO TAXATION, not increased taxation. I'm a free market capitalist, and an Austrian school monetarist. These are fully compatible with both conservatism, and traditional Republican values. Again, it would be wise of you to investigate the Republican platform of 1964, 1976 and 1980. You'll be shocked by how much you disagree with. Because it's basically the platform of Ron Paul. I mean, the guy is running on George Bush's 2000 platform for crissakes! What kind of "neo-Republican" such as yourself would have a problem with that?
Were they really Jewish? I'd have to assume you believe these gentlemen supported Iran, countries and organizations whose stated goal was the destruction of "our" country, were endorsed by white supremacists, had a disdain for Jews and would have vowed not to protect America. It makes me wonder how your positions reconcile with theirs. I was not aware of that. I knew you definitely supported Iran, the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism. How do you reconcile that? I've never seen anything to suggest otherwise. You should quote the entire wiki entry. Is this what you would use to compare RP to Reagan? Or not? You've put a great deal of effort in to painting yourself exactly as RP. It must have took a while. It would appear you believe in "I gots mine, you gotsta get yours." I'm not interested in a candidate that wants to go back to 1964 to abolish civil rights. I'm not interested in a candidate who wants to go back to the days of slavery. I'm not interested in a candidate whose talking points resemble our enemies. I'm not interested in a candidate who wants to dismantle our country. I'm not interested in a candidate who seeks failure in Iraq. I'm not interested in a candidate who writes racial newsletters. I'm not interested in a candidate who seeks every opportunity to blame America first. I'm not interested in a candidate who puts no thought into his extremist ideas, such as dismantling the IRS with no alternative. I'm not interested in a candidate who has made it clear he will not defend or protect America, no matter what the cost of American lives is. This is interesting. IIRC, in the past, you have said GWB is a liar, a liberal, the worst president ever, a miserable failure, bad for the economy, has diminished our standing in the world, is big government, big spender, poor at the economy and you take issue with him over the Patriot Act. Now you would like to convince me that RP is running on the same platform (obviously you are only referring to "no nation building")? Wanna try again?
The greatest part of this thread is the Democrat in hiding trying to explain how Ron Paul supporters aren't real conservatives, when Ron Paul's views are in line with Goldwater, Reagan, and Taft, and GTech's views (when not hidden from view) are of the neo-conservative brand. When I say neo-con, I mean the accepted definition of the majority of people who are familiar with the term, i.e. Democrats in the Republican Party who also support warfare along with their welfare state, not the twisted definition that you use.
Just wait until INSANE McCAIN doubles up with the most false fake cackling neocon whore in the whole wide world mate. It's going to be a focking disaster mate, absolutely no doubt about it. 4,000+ American soldiers killed in a fake war on terror and at least 500,000 innocent Iraqi's killed so far, this will increase greatly if these pair of clowns got in. But we know they won't because it's another Clinton nailed on as the next President. Of course the charade will go on until she get's elected. In a country of 300 Million people how come it always boils down to a Bush or a fucking Clinton? Jesus H Christ it's an absolute disaster.