My worst nightmare: RP runs for President as a third party candidate and Clinton wins thanks to RP taking more votes away from the Republican candidate than he does from Clinton. Nightmare!
Won't happen if you vote RP for Republican candidate. Seriously though, there will be no third party campaign. I am 99.9% certain of that.
Well this proves that we DO have more support than we're given credit for if you can at least fathom Hillary's road to the white house and the neocon venom that comes with it. i think the real problem is the other republicans who would be voting for the other Republican in the general election, that's the real nightmare. the differences between Hillary and say Mccain is like grass on a lawn. 2 blades might be a bit different but you'd have to be a fool not to realize they're coming from the same place. wanna hear a real nightmare? people not waking up soon. that's a f*cking nightmare. that's what caused this economic crisis. do you think the same ol' same ol' mentality is just gonna come by and fix it?
There was no chance that I'd vote for RP, I got to familiar with him back in the eighties. And of course there will be no more third party campaign, it's over.
According to this article John McCain says that he believes in "no gun control," http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-04-19-mccain_N.htm
the rest of the candidates (republican or democrate) are just puppets who are supported by some big special interest group or another. I dont know about you but im tired of these robots who dont have our interest at heart. At least with Ron Paul no one pulls his strings. He can really be a president of the people and have our interests at heart. None of the others could because they will owe their presidency not to the issues or their causes but to the heavy pockets of the special interest groups.
That sounds similar to the way that Ross Perot got Bill Clinton elected. However, Ron Paul is not pulling conservatives into his camp. He appeals mostly to left-wingers. Don't forget that he is not really a Republican. He is a Libertarian pretending to be a Republican.
It's unsubstantiated nonsense. Could you define conservatism to me? Read the Republican party platform recently? Paul is the living breathing Republican platform. More nonsense. He's been running for office as a Republican since 1976. He's a lifelong Republican from a Republican family. He is a "l'ibertarian, but not a "L"ibertarian, and if you don't know the difference, then you need to read this, http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2004/06/ronald_reagan_t.html
I would also like you to define conservative for me. RP is a true republican in the pure sense of how republicans used to be. You sire dont have a clue as to what a conservative is. Are you one? If so what is your stance on abortion, family values, morals, pre-emptive war etc. Im all ears. If you can make a blanket statement you should be able to define it.
How? Short of a conspiracy theory, I just don't see it. No candidate has fought for last place harder than Ron Paul. The campaign is incompetent, mismanaged, and simply doesn't have a clue about how to run a national campaign.
Gtech for a guy that implies that our president bush is a liar, how can anyone take your posts with more than a grain of salt. Isnt it unamerican? I would trust people that do not imply such things about our great president. Wouldnt you call that imcpontetent? Havent gotten an answer yet . Your silence says it all. Dont you agree guys?
I'm simply not interested in your dishonesty tonight. I'd just as soon go to a strip club, flash a few hundred dollar bills around, and listen to young women tell me how cute I am! Neither, of course, would be honest. How about having a baklava, a little something to clean your system out, and checking back with me tomorrow? Sound like a fair deal?
Engrish please! At least put some effort into trying to forum a coherent sentence. Bah, I'm probably asking too much
It's a shame that you have to resort to picking up petty grammar and typo errors to get a cheap thrill GTech.
Allready posted the link to this thread http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=679305&page=2 What matters most are the facts posted. Would people rather have a perfect sentence and a lie or an imperfect sentence and the truth. Again gtech, i guarantee you wont comment on that FACT. You say we found wmd's , president bush says we havent. HMmm shall we listen to our president who has all teh info needed, or someone posting on a forum here who cant prove a thing and wont admit when they are still twisting the truth. Thank god for my honest president. Like i said, its unamerican to call our president a liar. Do you not agree?
Ags, its ok dude because Gtech now knows hes wrong and everyone that has seen teh thread knows it and can even follow the link and get the quote from president bush himself. NO WMD's FOUND - thanks for clearing that up for us gtech. Where was it you were going to again?