So basically, in your studied opinion we're guilty if we say Dmoz has corruption and guilty if we say it doesn't. OK. Think I see your pattern. It's always enlightening to hear from someone so unbiased. But of course, you aren't obsessed.
Rob, they compain in both cases - when site is listed, and when is not; so this behaviour here is normal. Look at this: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=3593923&postcount=14 As usuall Ivan had ready answer
Yes, I shouldn't always be right, people might get suspicious that I'm actually meta purifier in disguise on a top secret mission of flushing out traitors inside DMOZ.
Whether true or not, perception is important. If there's a growing perception of corruption happening within the ODP, maybe it's time to take a serious look at how ODP operates.