Sorry about this guys but If you think that it sucks if you can't satisfy the woman is because that you have some problem in the confidence department. If you yourself know that you could do it firsthand then simply worry of getting the same amount of satisfaction you gave your partner. In other words, most of the guys that have voted for Can't give satisfaction have problems in their self-esteem and conscious with their performance.
As a woman you got no say in this matter, men think diffrently than women, "we hunt" we put food on the table, we protect our family and we satisfy our woman.
I have never had that problem although what really gets under my skin is when im about to ...... she stops for no reason! lol
Sounds like an intersting way of thinking you got there. I doubt that you do satisfy your woman. btw, women think differently than men, so you can't reason that out. It contradicts both principle.
I often get worried about size. Whats normal? In size? Thats my biggest fear. But it was slowly proven okay over time. P.S to those who think this is inappropriate. Its not. Its normal life.
So like even if i was really small. And i could last for hours, that would be good? (im not by the way lol)
Not giving satisfaction to your partner - this is a tragic problem for a man...for a woman...what can I say...is bad also, but not so bad as for the man...
Sexual Discussions do not qualify to be termed as "General Discussions". Lets see you discussing sexual matters with a group of strangers at a local train station. You say I won't tell you what you would do right? Well guess what Sherlock I never even said that, I only suggested the OP keep these matters to him/herself and their bedroom, but you took the wrong way around and got the idea that I was insisting/forcing/commending they do that, which is just wrong, revise your literary skills will ya? About your desire to break the law whenever, wherever you'd want to if you want to, keep going, I'll be there to laugh at you when you end up in a jail, getting some of the "sex" you'd otherwise have never had. About your comment on GC being full of shit, I can understand that, did I ever say otherwise? Did I ever tell you that General Chat was as clean as it could be and the only thing that was killing the general cleanliness was this particular thread? No I didn't, but this is supposed to be a webmaster's forum, and General Chat is a forum where you can talk about stuff in General, like I told your apparently rather intimate friend, the OP, sexual discussions do NOT qualify as general discussions, get that down. Also, just because I wasn't there/didn't have the time to/couldn't for some other reason criticize another thread for being wrong does NOT mean that I am supporting/on-purpose ignoring it, your stupidity achieved new levels of distinction when you implied this. Let me now bring my post to your ultimate naiveness, about me being religiously motivated to oppose this thread. Where the blue moon did you get that idea from anyway? Isn't there a possibility someone could have bought a link on my signature? Where in the hell do I say that I am religiously motivated for bashing people discussing their sexual curiosities on a webmaster forum? Look through all my posts if you want, Genius, but I am damn sure and can guarantee you that you'll not find one post contributing to this notion of yours. Read everything above, your answer is in there. I don't want to put you down due to the fact that I respect you.
You talk too much you know that? First of all, if you find this thread inappropriate for you, then don't post here. Nobody is asking for you opinion. Secondly, why does this thread bother you that much? some traumatic experience I think? That made you go religious? Dude, if you don't LIKE this thread then don't reply here. SIMPLE AS THAT. Cheers!