Ron Paul picks up Major Endorsement?

poor gtech rambles on as his man goes broke and is soon to be out of this race. I think Gtech is just mad now. Mr. 5th place all the time is gonna out run your guy haha thats soo funny, must be eating you away Gtech lmao.

 

Thanks and thanks to debunked and Kalvin too, for exposing the ron paul nazi's race baiting lies.

That particular post was remarkable! It accomplished exactly what I wanted. When words are directed at infidels, they are acceptable and defensible. When the recipient is changed to "muslim," suddenly it's an outrage and causes the forum racists to have "sudden outrage syndrome!"

I'd venture to say guru-seo is probably the biggest racist here:

He's never said a bad word about a terrorist, but not a day goes by that he isn't demonstrating his hatred for Christians, Jews and America.

 

I take it you were playing on your xbox today?

Let me know if you come out of the digital world where kids roam free, and back into reality.

ron paul nazi's are a hateful bunch of people, aren't they?

 

Hey GT can we get an update on your AdSense earnings from all your DP P&R RP bashing threads?

You certainly know how to milk them.

P.S Who are you going to support after the Huckster drops out? A lot of us are going to be anxious to see who you support.

I hear Hillary would be a great choice.

 

"We?" I was not aware hamas was interested in adsense?

I don't use adsense on DP.

I don't let alex jones do my thinking.

I don't support terrorists.

We don't have much in common, I'm afraid

 

If I've read this thread correctly, every ron paul supporter that has responded, has avoided the issue of their candidate's racism and endorsement from the largest state sponsor of terrorism.

Can we conclude then, that this is typical of most ron paul supporters here...that they support terrorist organization(s)?

 

lol typical response from you, just what I expected.

Anyway, let's try the question again buddy:

Who will you support when the Huckster drops out?

Let's see if you care to answer that simple Q.

 

Apparently that is a "yes" for AGS. I certainly didn't see a resounding "no"

 

Good Evening GTech.

Please read this,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_proof

Thanks.

 

Thanks guerilla, but you made your answer clear on page one of the thread.

So far, we have AGS, guerilla, guru-seo and killafawk. Am I missing anyone? I certainly don't want to miss anyone, that would be rude of me

iggysick?

 

My pleasure. Please keep in mind that an absence of proof can't be used as proof itself. That would be a logical fallacy.

 

There is no absence of proof of your support for Iran, a terrorist state.

 

Hmm, that's odd. I read back, and there is an obvious absence.

Looks like a logical fallacy to me.

 

Perhaps you should realize Iran isn't the only supporter of a terrorist state. Look only at your own country to see another example. Does that make you a terrorist sympathizer?

 

I agree, it's odd that you believe having an endorsement from the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism is a great thing.

fletch, can we mark you down in the "yes" category too? That sure doesn't seem like a "no" response.

 

Press.TV isn't the Iranian government.

Again, a lack of proof used as proof is a logical fallacy.

 

Gtech and logical in the same sentence is a fallacy.

 

GTech just red repped me. LOL.

I guess in the absence of a tangible argument, he'll resort to super devastating and sneaky tactics like negative rep! Oh no! All of my arguments have been refuted by rep outside P&R!

 

This is inaccurate. Perhaps re-reading the first post is in order:

Therefore, it is the Iranian government.

Next twist?

 

I've been right here in this thread. You should start a thread in GC about red rep. Most people don't care for those who cry about it.

I suppose I could just report your personal attacks to moderators all the time