A knock on Guiliani, a reference to today's money bomb, a quote from Bastiat, and a continued call for sound money. Campaign emails, particularly the ones written by Paul himself, always make me happy.
And certain dp people want to keep putting RP down because he is one of the few that is being honest here.
That is because they are brainwashed neocon supporting idiots mate. They would rather cheer some Gung Ho pro war lunatic from the comfort and safety of their own homes than support a guy that wants to end the killings of American troops occupying a country that they shouldn't be in.
I didn't raise it previously, because frankly I would not have logically placed a man proclaiming individual liberty in line with the John Birch Society, until my discovery that such was the case, a mere few days ago. But now that I do see the connection, I wonder why no one is addressing this. How can one proclaim "individual liberty," while supporting its opposite? If any would care to come forward, I invite your thoughts. http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=664080 Guru, he's just saying the word is "break," and not "brake." To "brake another record" is to stop or halt that record from happening. To "break it" is to better the previous record.