I'm in the process of writing an SEO Manual that will feature some groundbreaking information about things like keyword density and the management of off page optimization and linkbuilding. However, some of the information about off page optimization has to do specifically with calculating the number of required backlinks along with their PR in order for a site to rank for specific keywords. Basically, it is a method to use keyword research and novel information about competitors websites to arrive at a specific number and PageRank of backlinks to build. It also tells you the time your website will take to rank. This makes link building incredibly easy because it tells you exactly what you need to do in order to rank - thereby suddenly demystifying link building. This is extremely useful for getting short tail high competition keyword rankings. Now obviously if this information were made public, it would turn the SEO industry upside down because everyone would be doing it, and would thus nullify each others advantage. If this information were published in an e-book, it could be pirated and widely distributed, again nullifying any advantages it could have. Now I'm thinking of makign a subscription model for the SEO Manual, whereby people could pay for a subscription to use the information. It could also be presented in a video tutorial, or an online form-based tool. How would you guys like to see the Manual implemented? I need to know your suggestions so I can finalize and release the SEO manual. the website is at http://www.seomanual.net
PDF could be the best option for implementing the manual. Do keep the first 1 or 2 chapters open for everyone to see and of course the table of contents, so we know whats in there for us
so you mean 2 chapters should be open, and the rest password protected? How about if I create a membership system on the site through which people could pay to view the information? I was thinking of makign some video tutorials as well. I plan to make a walkthrough of the entire SEO process, but I think a video could describe it better than text. Or maybe both.
I would spend time building more back links (1000, 2000+) rather than thinking, calculating how many back links or PR i need
that approach that is sure to get you nowhere fast building thousands of backlinks will not do you any good if the backlinks are not relevant. You can build a million crappy links and still not rank. So number is not enough. You need quality, and a minimal number for your niche. Else you'll waste time and money buildiing links you dont need.
Do you have any evidence to prove your statement? Show me a website with thousands of backlinks but cannot get on Googe first page for several keywords.
188 back links cannot be comparable with 1000, 2000+ back links unisoft-technologies.com is less than 6 months old. Do you know when was the last time Google update PR? If you think it's good example for your theory then i have no comment.
but many top sites in google serp build many spam links and unrelevant link on purpose. maybe they want to hide something secret OR they do not know which links are quality ,just build many many links ,and then they got their sites top 10 in google. my question is : can you get right information to just analyse the competitor? and more, you can only see at most 1000 backlinks. but many site have above 10k backlinks(i know most of them are unuseful ,spam links they created on purpose maybe)
The problem to me is, say you actually could determine the "perfect" formula, based upon what Google wants and the competitiveness of particular keywords. Within a week or month or so of publication, everything has changed and your info isn't worth much.