NH polls coming in:

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by d16man, Jan 8, 2008.

  1. guru-seo

    guru-seo Peon

    Messages:
    2,509
    Likes Received:
    152
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #121
    BS stands for something else around here when we see your posts, so I would suggest you spell it out to avoid confusion. ;)
     
    guru-seo, Jan 9, 2008 IP
  2. pingpong123

    pingpong123 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,080
    Likes Received:
    117
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #122
    for me the heart comes first before the mind, before the boobs(close second though:D), and the legs and waist.
     
    pingpong123, Jan 9, 2008 IP
  3. pingpong123

    pingpong123 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,080
    Likes Received:
    117
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #123
    He probably rules out paul last year:D, who the heck in their right mind wants someone that speaks the truth, is for the american people, and follows the constitution. heck, you cant become an elite this way as it will take ages:).
     
    pingpong123, Jan 9, 2008 IP
  4. earlpearl

    earlpearl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,584
    Likes Received:
    150
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #124
    One interesting side note. Not as dramatic a difference as in Iowa (where Democrats voted at basically 2-1 over Republicans....but once again Democrats dramatically outvoted Republicans in the primary.....about 280,000 versus 220,000 in New Hampshire.

    In both states independants were encouraged to vote in the caucas and primaries.
     
    earlpearl, Jan 10, 2008 IP
  5. northpointaiki

    northpointaiki Guest

    Messages:
    6,876
    Likes Received:
    187
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #125
    TeeHeeTeeHeeTeeHee. I made a funny with bad words, momma.:rolleyes:

    In other news, somehat unrelated - sorry. But Kerry just endorsed Obama.

    I wonder who Hillary will face off in the general?
     
    northpointaiki, Jan 10, 2008 IP
  6. Zibblu

    Zibblu Guest

    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    98
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #126
    Also unrelated. But I heard some talk of a McCain/Lieberman independent run in the general if McCain isn't the nominee and I started laughing when I thought of this scenario: Huckabee (R) Vs. McCain (I) Vs. Obama (D) HAHAHAHAHAHAH. Expected result: Obama 60% McCain 19% Huckabee 19% Other 2%. The idea that he even thinks for a second that there's room for two pro-war candidates in a field of 3 makes me realize just how disconnected from reality McCain must be.
     
    Zibblu, Jan 10, 2008 IP
  7. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #127
    I am not surprised that someone like you who is obviously uneducated does not know that BS stands for Bachelor of Science. Why do you make this so easy?
     
    d16man, Jan 10, 2008 IP
  8. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #128
    Exactly. This is being done to intentionally hand the nomination to Clinton.

    None of the Republicans can match her, except maybe Paul, because his platform is better on substance. But even then, she has enormous star power, and Bloomberg will run independent at the first sign of trouble for an establishment candidate, to split the vote.

    It's what *some* of us keep saying. No one is going to elect a pro-war candidate. The only chance the GOP has, is to nominate a candidate even more anti-war than the DEM front runners. Of course, that may be the reason why they are running out a dud like Thompson, a country minister like Huckabee, Mr. 9/11 and slick Mitt. They aren't trying to win because they know the economic nightmare coming, and need as much distance from it as possible.
     
    guerilla, Jan 10, 2008 IP