Ron Paul's Polling Firm Behind Anti-Mormon Phone Calls

You honestly don't know the meaning of 'freedom of speech' You are free to spout what you want 'this is a privately owned forum though ' we however are free to ignore the crap you spew.

We can handle you Gtech, the problem is in your own dellusional mind you actually think you are correct. It gets old and to be totally honest, boring as fuck.

 

Everyday, you display an entirely new level of ignorance, that quite frankly astounds me, because you don't seem to care that you make absolutely no sense.

You have freedom of speech. I just don't have to listen to it. That's how freedom works. Zero coercion.

 

but you would love to take that freedom away, wouldn't you? That way you don't have to listen to it.

 

Not at all. The more GTech posts, the more he makes a fool of himself.

I'm not interested in taking away GTech's right to be ignorant, close minded, narcissistic, selfish, etc. I just have an equal right not to be subjected to it.

That's the beauty of a free market.

As far as censorship, I've had more of the Nixon Gang reporting me for banning than I have ever done to them (because I have never done that). It seems the small minded neo-conservatives are the ones who like to silence dissent.

 

Well Gtech has me on ignore, are you saying he's take away my freedom of speech?

On the same thought, he claims it is doing as much, yet he puts others on ignore. hmmm he attacks for someone putting him on ignore.

How about that hypocrite soup?

 

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2008/...nd_antimormon_calls_but_not_their_sponsor.php

I guess using the same logic as the topic creator used Romney must be behind the calls. Wouldn't it be best to wait and see who actually did them before blindly making accusations when even an article itself does not?

 

nope, you can continue to post your ridiculous viewpoints whether he has you on ignore or not.

 

My ridiculous view points that are facts, unlike the stuff you post

 

You also appear to change your tune depending on who you are responding to.

 

where did I say that putting someone on ignore takes away free speech rights? please show me the exact post....if you can't, stop trying to put words in my mouth to fit your agenda...

 

Ahh I'll bow down and say no you did not specifically state it, you however did put 'words' into guerillas mouth.

Don't like it when it's done to you do you?

 

If suggesting that he wants to do something is putting words in his mouth, then yes....otherwise, gtech is right...you have to have the last word no matter what.

 

d16 not at all, you have shown to love to put words into peoples mouths

You going to try to take your little butt buddies position in debates, seriously I didn't think anyone was as lowly as Gtech. But I guess when all you can do is chime into his threads and post 'yeah I agree' without ever seeing what a thread is about I should not be shocked...

 

On the same note where do I specifically state you said it?

 

right here...

 

That was a question, you did see the question mark did you not?



I was not saying you would like to, unlike what you did to guerilla

 

oh, so that was a question...looks like you didn't read the thread without jumping in the conversation...here is what I said...

Looks like I asked a question as well...now, how is what I did unlike what you did? Oh wait, its me and not you, right???

OWNED!

 

Not even close to owned

You accused me first of putting words into your mouth. You owned on point #1

#2 your question was an accusation, not merely a question.

Owned x 2..

Next weak attempt?


Your question is an accusation hidden as a question, pretty easy to see don't you think?

While my question was a straight out question.

 

but according to you, if I use a question mark, then it is a question...that is what you said here:

so once again, you are owned...you are trying to make it seem that what I did was not the same as you, when in fact it is....now, what are you going to write as the last word, because you always have to have it...

 

Ahh yes I did say that, I wont deny that. You have learned from Gtech well, twist as much as you can.
? marks can of course mean more than one thing, your so called 'question' has a accusation hidden inside of it, I do not have one in mine

Ahh again taking one from Gtechs play book. You would in fact be having the last word if I let your baseless lies stand, so either I let you get off the hook with lies or I 'have the last word' Can you not do anything without using Gtech?

I'm also glad you used that quote.

I said more than a question mark now didn't I?