LOL. Hi my name is Will.Spencer if any document is from the goverment it must be 100% true no questions asked.
And the question is conveniently ignored. It's amazing how many people are ashamed of where they are from.
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=610182 We are not at war. A war was not declared. We authorized the use of military force. A declaration of war is different. But back to the meat of the argument, weren't those justifications WMDs?
It's amazing how anyone could consider voting for Giuliani. Simply because he is someone who obtained fame through his shameless use of a tragedy. the man is a vulture feasting on the corpses of every single person who died in those towers. Compared to that, Being a creationist moron seems fairly respectable.
These knobheads think that because Bush said it was/is a "war on terror" then the US is at war, it's complete and utter bullshit and most of us know it.
I agree with alot of your views but being a creationist does not automatically make you a moron, though I can see why you think that.
Sorry, unlike your candidate, I am not fluent in doublespeak. Actually, that's an urban legend spread by ignorant libtards. WMD represented only a portion of the items in the Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq.
Liberty 1. The condition of being free from restriction or control. 2. The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's own choosing. 3. The condition of being physically and legally free from confinement, servitude, or forced labor. See synonyms at freedom. God damn Liberals!!!! Your views are so wrong!!
Giuliani is a good executive with an impressive track record. 9/11 has nothing to do with my reasoning to support Rudy's Presidential bid. If a better candidate was available, I'd switch in an instant. I don't like Rudy's weakness on the Second Amendment and I don't normally support candidates who have not "earned their spurs" as state governors. And yet... I can't see anyone close to Rudy in the current field of candidates.
Ad Hominem. Ad Hominem. Re-read it. WMDs are mentioned several times. I would say they are the PREVAILING portion.
Classic liberals are fine. It's the modern socialists who believe in big government, and welfarism, as well as the confiscation and redistribution of income who actually undermine classical liberal philosophies. You can't be free to choose, if the government makes choices for you and your income.
You're about seven decades behind the times. The "Liberals" have been strongly opposed to "liberty" since the reign of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. If you really want to understand, try to read The Leave Us Alone vs. the Takings Coalition. If it makes you feel any better, the author of that paper is one of the founders of the Islamic Institute and he's a big lobbyist for Islamists in Washington -- even representing several known terrorists.
That is debatable. I think Giuliani is a decent executive, with a corrupt track record. That's good. 9/11 happened under his watch, and was 6 years ago. It would have been a great campaign focus for 2000. Mike Gravel. I like how he believes that we need people want authority not freedom. It was one of the strongest points of Hitler's regime. LMAO. Rudy can't even get on the ballot in every state. He's lost the endorsement of the so-cons to Huckaboo, the fis-cons to Paul/Romney and the independents to McCain/Paul. Rudy's base is basically the pro-war crowd without a second issue. Also known as "idiot voters".
You really should read up on that term before you use it incorrectly again. I've let it go uncorrected many times now, but the only effect has been to make you look even more ignorant.