The NFL 2007 Season

Discussion in 'Movies, Music & TV' started by timsdd, Jul 24, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SeagullSid

    SeagullSid Active Member

    Messages:
    394
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #421
    100% agree. I thought the Eagles had finally come up with a plan to beat the Pats - get the receivers to cut back inside the cornerbacks. It worked time and time again, think of their last scoring drive which was what 10 plays (I think) - all passes. Screen passes for short yardage and the "I going outside no I'm not" passes for the long gains. The ONLY thing they could POSSIBLY do wrong was throw outside - so they did it.
     
    SeagullSid, Nov 27, 2007 IP
  2. timsdd

    timsdd Peon

    Messages:
    21,102
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #422
    bad time to loose their minds! ;)

    it's like making 17 perfect dives in the Olympics and then belly flopping on the last final 18th dive...bad news bears! err eagles.

    WHICH MEANS, since all of the NFC East lost on Sunday, the Cowboys winning Thursday would give them a virtual lock on winning the East. I can't remember if they would in fact clinch or be within one game of doing so :eek:

    First time since 1998 if they win the division though :)
     
    timsdd, Nov 27, 2007 IP
  3. timsdd

    timsdd Peon

    Messages:
    21,102
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #423
    Who do you like tomorrow?

    Let me rephrase that, who do you think will win and why?
     
    timsdd, Nov 28, 2007 IP
  4. westoff

    westoff Peon

    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #424
    Well the Pats are now 12-0, and it doesnt get any easier next week. They get to play the Steelers! From the time the Pats beat the Colts I have said that the Steelers will be the team to beat them. They have a great defense and a strong running game, but Big Ben really needs to step up and not commit any turnovers to succeed. For the Pats, I think Belichik already has them on their tip toes working on how to get better.
    As for Dallas beating the Packers, it would have been a different outcome if Favre was actually in the game :p.

    Westoff.
     
    westoff, Dec 4, 2007 IP
  5. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #425
    The last three games have proven without a doubt that the Pats are quite beatable, and not entirely unstoppable...
     
    Mia, Dec 4, 2007 IP
  6. timsdd

    timsdd Peon

    Messages:
    21,102
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #426
    wrong, the team to beat them was the Eagles but they blanked up!!

    actually I didn't see the game last night, did Bal have a shot? :eek:
     
    timsdd, Dec 4, 2007 IP
  7. westoff

    westoff Peon

    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #427
    Any team is beatable if they have been beaten and any team is stoppable once they have been stopped, none of those apply to the Pats thus far. Not beaten and un-stopped.

    Hell yea they had a shot, and they had put the Pats away too, but they forgot to completely seal the deal in fourth and just let up too early. Pats shifted into the next gear, and beat the Ravens on a Brady TD pass with 44 seconds to go. Ah, the greatness of Tom Brady. The best clutch player since Micheal Jordan.

    Westoff.
     
    westoff, Dec 4, 2007 IP
  8. timsdd

    timsdd Peon

    Messages:
    21,102
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #428
    right :rolleyes: I finally read the recap of the game...some questionable penalties too to keep the drive alive? they must be on the never ending payroll of the mastermind (Bill B) ;)
     
    timsdd, Dec 5, 2007 IP
  9. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #429
    You sound like Mike Brady.. What incredible double speak.. :D
     
    Mia, Dec 5, 2007 IP
  10. westoff

    westoff Peon

    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #430
    The penalties weren't that questionable, Ravens just made stupid mistakes. Plus, through the first three quarters all penalties were going Balitmore's way.

    And man, I love your Bill B comments, hahahaha :D.
     
    westoff, Dec 5, 2007 IP
  11. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #431
    What is questionable is using video footage to spy on other teams during games..
     
    Mia, Dec 5, 2007 IP
    timsdd likes this.
  12. westoff

    westoff Peon

    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #432
    Yea, the question is which teams are still doing it, after the Pats getting caught :rolleyes:.

    Westoff.
     
    westoff, Dec 5, 2007 IP
  13. sawz

    sawz Prominent Member

    Messages:
    8,225
    Likes Received:
    808
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #433
    you just can't get over that can you. so what, they got caught and every team does it.

    every team still does it, their just careful how they do it.
     
    sawz, Dec 5, 2007 IP
  14. westoff

    westoff Peon

    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #434
    Exactly. Since the Pats don't do it anymore, you can say they are playing with a disadvantage and still winning ;).
     
    westoff, Dec 5, 2007 IP
    Mia likes this.
  15. sawz

    sawz Prominent Member

    Messages:
    8,225
    Likes Received:
    808
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #435
    of course their still doing it, i just hope their being a little more sneaky about it. :D

    and yes, it seems their unstoppable, we'll see with the Steelers up next.
     
    sawz, Dec 5, 2007 IP
    Mia likes this.
  16. timsdd

    timsdd Peon

    Messages:
    21,102
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #436
    Bob Kraft has so much $$, he's probably in talks with getting his own spy satellite or at the very least a Patriots spy plane.
     
    timsdd, Dec 5, 2007 IP
    Mia likes this.
  17. westoff

    westoff Peon

    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #437
    Ok, so now a Steeler's player is "guaranteeing" a win over the Pats, though Steeler's other players are still downplaying the optimism :rolleyes:.
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3142456

    I love how he is getting so over-confindent. It's only gonna hurt more once they lose :D.

    Westoff.
     
    westoff, Dec 6, 2007 IP
  18. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #438
    How exactly do you guarantee something like that.. I mean, if the don't win, will he give his salary back or something?
     
    Mia, Dec 6, 2007 IP
  19. timsdd

    timsdd Peon

    Messages:
    21,102
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #439
    yeah, that's good :rolleyes:. like you need to give the Pats more of an incentive to put the smack down!
    no kidding. players either need to shut their cake holes or ante up "if we don't win, I'll donate 3 games pay to charity" or something like that!!
     
    timsdd, Dec 6, 2007 IP
  20. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #440
    Better yet, the anti up should be entire salary given to tax payers that foot the bill for the stadiums!
     
    Mia, Dec 6, 2007 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.