DMOZ Editors Accept Bribes? Lets Review Objectively

yes, but when the devil uses scripture to his own ends a good christian will counter what is said with more scripture or at the very least put such scripture back into the proper context. Sadly, all you can come up with is Shakespeare. Now mind pointing out anything that can prove me wrong?

I have given the guidelines of the ODP and the posts of two senior editors... what more do I need?

Seriously, I would not go on and on and on about such things, but people keeping saying that I'm lying, yet I'm the ONLY ONE offering any thing in the way of proof. Well, if what I am saying is untrue, then there should be something other then your post count to prove it.

 

When a nuclear sub is commissioned there is a ceremony where a bottle of champagne is broken across the bow. Using the simplistic line of reasoning that started and has perpetuated your argument ... it would be a fair to say "A nuclear submarine is a bottle opener".

In the same vein, it is true that one can get a site added to dmoz by an SEO who is a dmoz editor and is adding it in the course of his other paid SEO work on a site.

That is by no means the same as simply paying for a listing, but such nuances are outside of the grasp of a few here. LOL. Usually items that dense have their own gravitational field.

Really? Since when?

BTW sweetpea... A week or 2 ago I got a message from someone saying you asked them to ask ME "not to be so mean to you". LOL. I ignored the fact that grown men shouldn't sound like members of a high school girls choir... and I avoided confronting you directly since.

But as I predicted... even with me trying to cut slack you inserted yourself into every post I've made since then, quoting me and trying to raise a fight. OK, I tried, you failed. From now on if you want me to be nicer, just try being smarter. No more whining to the girls.

 

Does anything else really need to be said on this topic? I mean really? Doesn't this shit get old for all of us?

Seems pretty cut and dry to me.

 

You shouldn't talk about Q like that, even if it is true.

 

What on earth are you talking about, you are the one dragging it out. Do you talk to God about the way you treat people here? You should... as it's certainly not very Christian like. I've given my side of the story with proof to back myself up. You won't even give your editor name. Now what does that say about the corruptibility of the editors?

Make all the claims you'd like, back it up or shut it up. And when it comes to dragging it out, yeah, I brought it up in this thread, as this thread has been brought up before, but YOU are the one dragging it out. So stop blaming me for what YOU are doing.

So, you don't seem to have problems talking about PRIVATE messages eh? Mind taking those morals to the scandal thread and telling us all about Annie?

 

Another spat coming on, is that part of being in magick? Better watch for the spells coming soon.

You missed the opportunity to comment again on SEO work meaning ODP is not free.

What's that you don't disclose contents of private emails on here, Q.

Now be carefull, think what satan would want.

 

Why reply to that part of my post and not this part: I've given my side of the story with proof to back myself up. You won't even give your editor name.

Is it because you know I'm right and you can't handle the truth?

I don't believe in your god, why would I believe in your satan? The gods I follow were made up long before yours were

 

You know about this Christian God like you know about editing?

2 minutes give up?

Perhaps you should know the bits that say Heathens should be burned at the stake. That's not very nice, well not for you anyway.