New clickable area - people would think the link isn't working so would move on

Discussion in 'AdSense' started by qwestcommunications, Nov 22, 2007.

  1. #1
    My initial reaction was that it was a good move as it would reduce unintended clicks, but having considered this more thoroughly, my belief is that if people clicked on the old clickable area then they probably meant to clcik on an ad anyway.

    But knowing how impatient web surfers are, if the first click does not work because it was clicked on the new non-clickable area, they will move on rather than clicking on the actual link because they would form an impression the link is not working.
     
    qwestcommunications, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  2. Pendragon

    Pendragon Peon

    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Personally, I don't care whether people click my ads accidentally or intentionally, as long as they click them....:D

    However, I'm not sure you are right about people moving on if the first click doesn't work. I would hazard a guess that if a person was really interested in the ad and the first click didn't work, they would just try again. Just like you do if a menu link doesn't work first time.

    Originally I wasn't keen on this new layout, but in all honesty, I haven't noticed a great deal of difference in the CTR.
     
    Pendragon, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  3. newzone

    newzone Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,865
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    Digital Goods:
    1
    #3
    I don't think...when you want to click a button you click the button not an blank area at 10cm distance
     
    newzone, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  4. Elsa2

    Elsa2 Peon

    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Same here, i set up my sites to deliberately confuse my traffic, into not realising they are ads. 100% legal.
     
    Elsa2, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  5. qwestcommunications

    qwestcommunications Notable Member

    Messages:
    8,868
    Likes Received:
    172
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    233
    #5
    Thats not a good idea.
     
    qwestcommunications, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  6. Fka200

    Fka200 Guest

    Best Answers:
    0
    #6
    Fka200, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  7. qwestcommunications

    qwestcommunications Notable Member

    Messages:
    8,868
    Likes Received:
    172
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    233
    #7
    Maybe you are right. Maybe this will have positive long term effect in that people clicxking through mean to do so in the strictest term, so there is less likely to being smartpriced.
     
    qwestcommunications, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  8. arpitagarwal82

    arpitagarwal82 Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,996
    Likes Received:
    398
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #8
    This will certainly decrease CTR. But in long term its a good move for both advertisers and publishers.
    Advertisers will get better return of the money they have invested in their advertising campigns. For publishers, cost per click may increase in near future.
     
    arpitagarwal82, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  9. wildfire07

    wildfire07 Peon

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    In the long term this will be good for Publishers and Advertisers and legitimize the whole net advertising industry. Advertisers won't pay for useless clicks anymore-thats the heated news right now.
     
    wildfire07, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  10. Dollar

    Dollar Active Member

    Messages:
    2,598
    Likes Received:
    82
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #10
    Thats why 99% of Myspace resource sites are absolute shit.
     
    Dollar, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  11. linkmanager

    linkmanager Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,432
    Likes Received:
    113
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #11
    HMM of course this change cut some worthless clicks .. CTR is lower but conversion should be much better for Advertisers
     
    linkmanager, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  12. Erind

    Erind Peon

    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    I'm a little pissed off that the description text isn't clickable. I don't care abnout the blank space but the text SHOULD be clickable.


    Would image ads be better now?
     
    Erind, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  13. agnivo007

    agnivo007 Peon

    Messages:
    4,290
    Likes Received:
    289
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Well, then how often do you find a whole <div> clickable on normal webpages?
     
    agnivo007, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  14. horisly

    horisly Guest

    Messages:
    409
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    I get a new point different from yours.
    As the new clickable area locating at url and the link, not all the ads area as before, when surfers encounter ads, they are more likely to take the ads link as the site's own content links, then click it.

    for me, I have seen the ctr increasing.
     
    horisly, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  15. agnivo007

    agnivo007 Peon

    Messages:
    4,290
    Likes Received:
    289
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    Yes, that'd probably combat the adsense blinding of surfers. Hey, over 60% of sites today use adsense (atleast I think so), so people are getting used to adsense. Hope this change makes it appear part of the page as the poster above says.
     
    agnivo007, Nov 22, 2007 IP
  16. danimal

    danimal Active Member

    Messages:
    1,024
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #16
    100% stupid.

    it's a recipe for "smart pricing".
     
    danimal, Nov 22, 2007 IP