Nice twist I can be wrong, I like being shown wrong as I improve as a person from knowledge. I choose 'sides' if you want to call it that when I see it as the right, correct decision. I however do not blindly follow a side like you, I can be on the dems side for one thing and the republicans for another topic, while not on any side for another. You on the other hand choose a side blindly, but I know you can not see the difference. So you can't point these double standards out, much like your other crap filled attacks. What does that have anything to do with anything? I voted for the other guy, ANYONE but Bush. That's a shocker to you? It matters how exactly? Ohyeah because in your lack luster logic if you do not support Bush you can't be a republican. Let you in on a little secret, MANY republicans do not support Bush. You are the one who claimed that's who the majority of his support was, the basis for your attacks, yet you have no proof. Oh my god, give me a break. Talk about absolutely no credibility at all.
So now we've flipped and admitted we do choose sides, when before we've said that we never take sides, because we are a "free thinker." It would make sense then, that you supported John Kerry, while talking about flip flopping. To sum up that you have no credibility, you will not answer my legitimate question. It actually counters your assertion. If RP were to denounce the racists that have flocked to him (surely not because of his past racial statements, no...it couldn't be because of that!), the neo nazis, the anarchists, the 'troofers" that alex jones has instructed to vote for him, the anti-semites...who would be left? It's no wonder RP won't accept or denounce any group's official support. If he did, he wouldn't' have anyone left.
Nope Gtech you are proving yourself to be the people you hate, the people who take Rush out of context. Of course someone is going to take a side on an issue, I however do not blindly take political sides as a whole. You know like you do. There is no flipping going on, lots of twisting by you I am and have always been against the war, in that part it makes me on a side if you want to be so technical. I however am not on a democrat or republican side, I can and will debate both sides within that topic. I know with your closed mind you can't comprehend this, maybe it's too advanced for your primitive thinking? I have not flip flopped one bit there Gtech, you however are a pro at twisting No Gtech it is you with no credibility at all, you made an assertion you can not back up. Back it up then we will talk, until then it's up to you to prove it, not the other way around. Speaking of denouncing these groups, why were you not for Bush doing the same for his 'support'?... hmmmm
Nope, grim could never flip flop! He could never be wrong! He could never have multiple positions! He would never take on the "popular" stance to be a hero! Nope, not grim! Even if he does it, he couldn't possibly be actually doing it, because...well, because he is grim! It's always everyone else with the problem. If you don't agree with grim, as soniqhost didn't, then the problem is yours, not grims! Still no source for these claims about Bush? I wonder why? Which side is grim on? Let's stick our finger in the air and see which way the wind is blowing Popularity rules!
Wow Gtech must trully be losing this argument. I have multiple positions, but I ONLY take the popular stance? Hmmm thanks for proving yourself wrong. I can be wrong, I actually stated as such. Flip flop, multiple positions, popular stance, all things you can never point out, but all things you change the subject to when you are owned. soniqhost stated his record didn't need defending because it stood for itself. Yet his own deputy mayor showed otherwise, a twist of his 'record' It was not disagreeing with me Gtech, it was disagreeing with someone who actually worked with the guy. Speaking of which, anyone who is not on your side 100% is a 'terrorist supporter' or 'tearing down America' Claims about Bush, Gtech I sourced them, you bypassed them Still no source about RP, I wonder why. Popularity, yet again Gtech, more crap from you when you are owned. Your popularity argument is so lame, pathetic isn't even descriptive enough for it.
Grim, have you consider making statements to solicit forum support from other RP supporters? I bet if you did, you could probably build some "popularity" to back your weak attempts. Speaking of which, anyone that does tear America down and actually support terrorists, never receive a bad word from you. Have you ever noticed that? Claims about Bush sourced? If you went back and edited a post, then you should have no problem pointing it out again, huh? I dare ya! Ever find yourself in a pit that you can dig out of, again?
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=5242945&postcount=21 I don't know, have you? --- I see you as tearing down America for what it was founded on Gtech, appears I question you alot
I met Rudy in an informal setting. Not a bad guy but is just too full of himself these days thinking he's "The 9/11 Hero Mayor" and that getting Judy to marry him means he's all the envy in the boys clubhouse. To even think he's presidential material is hilarious. Nobody takes him any more seriously than they do his comb over.
I wonder why he is past Hilary in the polls than? He is the 9/11 hero. After all he was the mayor of NYC. As good as Bush did I still give Rudy more praise for ground work.
Which poll are you talking about? He's leading in the extremely limp and lame Republican polls but not nationally. The candidates for president are truly terrifying.
Here are a couple of polls you might want to look at. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...general_election_giuliani_vs_clinton-227.html