Since we are going to divert attention from the fact that the empty suits can't handle Ron Paul, by blaming the candidates for their supporters, let's talk about some other candidates' supporters. Giuliani is a good start. http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=3753385 He doesn't just support Giuliani, Giuliani supports him. And who can forget this faux pas? http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=3753385
I cannot stand Giuliani he will be worst than Bush, if he gets the presidency I'm movin' out before all hell breaks loose.
Yeah there are tons of things on Giuliani, like the others but for some reason a few trolls only go after RP. Of course the same trolls say he has no chance, but if he has no chance why are they so worried? http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/17/us/politics/17giuliani.html?ref=health http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3881195&page=1 Such a long list, but lets try to look at any supporter of a candidate, many of the same supporters supported Bush who did not speak against the support either, but of course that was ok you know.
Double standards at their finest. Yeah there are tons of things on RP, like the others but for some reason one narcissist only goes after other candidates other than RP. Of course the same narcissist continues to demonstrate double standards in every post. If only I had more time to taunt him
There are not tons of things on RP. There is the one debunked article, and people criticize his supporters. Other than that, I believe he's pretty clean.
Just take a close look at the people attacking him. They have shown time and again they cannot debate him. That they lie about him is to be expected. Ron Paul will likely not stoop to their level, but he has supporters who will continue to call these hypocrites out. BTW, you notice no one can really defend Giuliani here.
You've gotta be kidding me. A troll calling double standards when he himself is the poster child for double standards, attacking one candidate over and over. Seriously, pathetic, sad and weak and that's about it.
Really, did you even bother to read my first post? 1 deputy mayor under him showing he took a total 180 from his 'record' 2 fire fighter families against him for what he draws power on '9/11' Or could it be more likely there is no defending the truth
Point 1. People try things and if they work great and if they don't they change course to be more effective and that's what he did with enrolling people into health care program that they were eligible for. Point 2. A lot of those families are mad because the fireman didn’t have proper communication equipment but that’s not the mayor’s fault really since its spectrum issues and that is controlled by the federal government and I believe that issues still haven’t been taken care of.
Ahh so it's because it was not effective that he changed, but if it was someone on the other side such nice quotes as 'flip flopping' would be put out there. Nothing to do with 'what didn't work' has to do what he has to do in order to get elected. He also is attacking people for having the same stance he at one time had, kind of hypocritical. There is more to it than just the communications, it also has alot to do with him using 9/11 for political gain among other reasons. But I thought he didn't need defending, hmmmm
They're politicians they say what they need to say to get elected. Hilary Clinton has had 5 positions on licenses for illegal immigrants. As for using 9/11 for political gain tell me one thing in this country that isn't political. I bet you if it was their candidate of choice using 9/11 for political gain they wouldn't abject.
Ahh yes they all flip flop back and forth, and we should just expect it and allow it, support them anyways. Or shock we could hold them accountable, be it a democrat or republican. I don't support Hillary one bit, she's scares me more out of all of them, not sure what that has to do with Giuliani being against something, then for it, then against it and claiming he lowered costs for a city when in fact the story is a bit different. Actually I find it disgusting when anyone uses 9/11 for their own gain, political, financial, anything for that matter. But I guess those who actually had a stake in it, you know lost people, their opinion doesn't matter.
He would have to go a long way to be worse than Bush, but he has definitely got the potential to do so.
And goes right on demonstrating such! Hilarious! I gotta get some of these projects finished up so I can come back and point out all the hypocrisy! No one should be held accountable, though, for all the anti-semitic, neo-nazi, anarchist, "troofer," anti-American support though. If that candidate were to denounce it, he'd have no one left to support him. Inconvenient "troofs."
Someone still obviously doesn't get the difference between 'supporters' and ones own 'actions' Speaking of hypocrisy, someone bashes only one candidate over and over, but when good points are raised on another not a word. Hmmmmm Someone bashes someone for support, the same supporters who supported his current guy Bush. But not a word for them supporting Bush. Yeah Gtech bring it, I'll be glad to make you look like a fool per usual.
Yes, apparently "someone" doesn't still get it. One standard for thee, another standard for everyone else. And why are MOST of one's supporters all in these few categories? Surely it sends a message about them? Does Ron Paul shop at "white" sales? Someone doesn't speak a word when his side (those that are anti-US, those that ceaselessly tear America down, those that have supported terrorists in the past) starts posts, but if someone points out that RP farted in a Jewish bistro, starts crying. Yeah, grime, bring it on boy! Obviously the gym doesn't have an exercise for common sense. You big ol' brute stud, you!
That would be you Gtech. I am not bashing Bush for having supporters that you are bashing RP for having the same supporters. Yet you fail to bash Bush for the same support, you do get this do you not? I do have one standard as I am not bashing either, you on the other hand are picking which one to bash Proof please of who 'most' of his supporters are. Since you claim such a thing, obviously you have numbers showing a majority are KKK members or something. Classic Gtech, bypass the point and go to 'tearing down America, terrorist supporters' Give me a break. Actually I do speak up when I see BS posted on either side, just so happens you post more BS than anyone else. If it did I'd be the first to sign you up, you are in obvious need of some.
Yeah, grim could never be wrong. He could never have double standards. He never chooses sides, he's a "free thinker!" BTW, who did you vote for in the 2004 Presidential Campaign, grim? Proof that most of RP's supporters are not "troofers," anti-semites, neo nazis, racists? I'd love to see proof that most of his supporters do not fall into one of those groups. It would be a huge feather in your hat too, grim. Let me know what you find.