http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=559231 ^^^ LOL That was the thread a posted earlier well it was talking about my site getting sued and now dont you agree www.oogle.com is a complete RIP off of google well not rip off but a way the would make money they even use Their LOgo!!!!
Because they want to make some easy money without having any real skills themselves. I don't endorse this kind of operation but when money is the motivation, people do a lot of stupid things like the site talked about here.
its not stealing, people park pages most of the times and people buy typo domains and part them to recieve traffic. this is a form of domain parking too and domain parking isnt stealing.
The domain oogle.com is redirected to ordisante(DOT)com/google(DOT)html. PR N/A so it must be new, (the Google cache is from 16 Nov). if you search for that domain in Google it shows just the one result. As soon as he starts getting back links then I guess he will be Notified... I wonder if that is AdSense for search? If so then I wonder if it may be OK??? There is a link (although tiny) back to his blog!.. ... Dunno! Cheers James
They have a premium account i guess, according to how the ads are displayed. I bet you can not cite too much. oogle is NOT a trademark of google. You have no idea what are you talking about, google can trademark MISSPELLS not for letter missing. DO you think ebay have trademark on bay? or ebuy on buy? So, google can not do too much. The only issue is the logo used, but if they use the google adsense for search and they are approved, then they should be ok.
wow wow, they must get tons of type in traffic a day. This domain it directs to (ordisante.com) is 255,092 on Alexa.com and the site only has 800 or so Y!backlinks... So Guess thats from the type ins to oogle.com
yeah exactly like jahoo.com it has traffic thanks to typo's lol and idk well whoever said google owned "oogle" gave me bad info and why did froogles.com get sued?? Google Owns froogle.com Froogles got sued for having adding an s and having almost same content i dont understand why would they sue this site if they sued froogles for just one s LOL
Nick, come on now. I noticed something, and pointed it out... it was not meant to be concrete at all....I said I was going out on a limb, and I was...as in I'm not sure..