What's Good in America?

I see Stox has been banned - not sure why, except for his childish thing re: Gtech's name. Thanks, Grim, I do see the thread, but it looks like this was midway in the stream. The guy's gone, so I guess it doesn't really matter, but Gtech, Grim, or anyone - do you have the original post on the subject, forward?

 

Nope I don't have the original, it would appear to be from the quotes there though. Nowhere do I see him saying what someone is claiming he said.

He may have said it, I however did not see it.

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=3464145#post3464145

Possibly this? Not sure, Gtech would have to answer if he has the proof stox said it.

 

I saw the links to, but they all refer to stuff that preceded the links - so I'm not sure what is going on. Still, when looking at the Lorien/Stox thing, I am flabbergasted by Stox's response to Lorien. To Lorien's direct, I'd say, unequivocally direct question,

-He didn't deny that, and in fact said this was "better" than the soldiers committing atrocities:

To which I'd have to say, (1) 'kay, he didn't deny he supported the bullshit Lorien pointed out - in fact, he tacitly admit he did support it, as "better" than another atrocity. Which leads to (2), how the hell is it "better?" Personally, if the soldiers did what they were accused of, bring them down; and the use of terror, bring it down. To indicate support of one evil by referring to another has never made sense to me. And such was my problem with Stox. He'd play the "intellectually honest" card out of one side of his mouth, and when called on it, he would resort to any number of tactics that weakly covered his true state of mind.

That said, he's gone, and can't defend his position, so I'll not continue with more.

 

Very good of you

Yeah I don't like what he said in ways either, but I don't see it exactly adding up to what was claimed.

Either was you are correct in the quote above..

 

That was the thread I was referring to.

 

Great post, so true.

 

Another one banned lol.

The place is beginning to suck when people are getting banned for calling GTech a twat.

 

Yet another useful post by Insight personified.

 

LOL.........

 

Nobody is forcing you to stay here.

 

Personal attacks will not be tolerated ~ Forum rules.

Yeah, I agree AGS. Whats the fun of Political and religious board when you can't call people names, can't abuse someone who happens to disagree with you. Moreover, whats the fun when you are expected to argue like a mature.. No fun dude.. yeah it sucks.


AS Rob said, No one is forcing you to stay AGS. (Anthony has a tremendous board BTW, did you know that?)

 

I know.

Seems to me that the crazy gang tend to gang up on people by reporting posts because they are lame asses. Very quick to dish out attacks on other members but not very happy when the roles are reversed.

These people need to get more balls IMO.

 

Please take your off-topic attention seeking elsewhere. This isn't about your nightmares, imagined or real. Thanks.

 

What's up with you dude?

I thought you had me on ignore?

 

No, I find your posts meritless. There is a difference. Now, did you have something substantive to contribute, or your usual? If the latter, perhaps you should just start another thread on whatever boogeyman you've got going for the time being, and leave this discussion for folks who aren't really all that interested in your squabbles with the ethereal "crazy gang"?

 

Not sure what you mean, I have always found your posts utterly hopeless.

I still do.

 

To truly insult, AGS, you have to improve on the banter. Saying in effect "I know you are, but wadd em I!!!!!!???????" doesn't rise to the level of insult, just puerility.

Now, something to contribute, or more idle chat?

 

DP doesn't have a minimum balls requirement...and I doubt we ever will.

 

DigitalPoint, no matter how big your balls are, ours are bigger!

 

You got that right!






.... well... maybe not for all...