guy gets beat up on subway for asking ppl to stop smoking

I would beat any person if that person beat me first, like a a girl came and started to kick me in the nuts i would just slam her down with no mercy, but not if she burch slap me i mean if she really wanted to kick my ass all over the floor hehe

 

Better watch what you claim, do something like this in front of me and it will be me having 'no mercy' with you...

I am shocked so many of you guys are such pussies that you could not simply hold hands behind backs, detain, that you'd actually need to punch back against a woman.

I think it's never been more apparent that most in this forum are a bunch of needle dicked wimps.

Yet he didn't, including against the at least one who appeared to be a guy.
Wow jump on the bandwagon of just attacking a chick, when if you use any thought process at all if you want a chance in a fight you're going to want to take the big MALE out first. Not some tiny little chick who weighs 1/2 of you. If you can't take the guy out you have no chance anyways, take the guy out and don't look like such a submissive pussy like this guy looked and something tells me the woman back down.

Look at how the guy acts, totally submissive. People like the group that hit him thrive off of it, it's power. Grow a set, take the guy out, don't be a little bitty pussy.

But no instead hit the chick, yeah that'll almost help in this situation. Even if you're pro hitting woman it's simply a stupid option in this case.

 

That is the scary part is people like you sympathize with and participate with the criminals not the victims. If you were in the subway not only would this peaceful guy get attacked by these violent people but you would jump in and help them. You are worse than the people who just stand by and do nothing.

You are a criminal are no better than they are. You are the problem.

P.S. The one in the grey top may be a man but very effeminate the rest appear to be masculine looking females.

 

Oh give me a break, bypass the fact that there is a guy there, bypass the facts and go on about hitting a chick.

Yeah I'm showing the logical way out of it, instead the people on here with ZERO balls are all for hitting a chick.

In such a case the guy would have gotten his ass kicked far worse!

It is YOU who is the problem...

BTW in the case of the subway, I could very easily of helped the guy out without hitting any single female. But yeah 'I'm the problem' bit different from a guy having 'no mercy' on a chick.

Since when did everyone lose their balls?

--edit
BTW I was responding to the guy above about being kicked in the balls, not about the subway. Yet you turned it into the subway, I'm sorry but you appear to get off on the chance or act of hitting woman.

Since you added this. 'effeminate' yet twice the size of the females, I highly doubt the females would have been as cocky as they were had their male backup been taken out. Plus it appears to be possibly one more male on their side, possibly more behind them that did not get involved.
Masculine, yeah what all 5 foot and 110 pounds of them.

Even if you are for hitting woman, if he would have gotten up and attacked one woman 'at least one woman' was trying to pull them off of him, all would have turned on him, he would have been exposed and gotten his ass kicked more. You people have never been in a fight have you?

I guess maybe it's just my size, being hit by little itsy bitsy woman like that though sure doesn't scare me to the point of hitting them back in any case.

 

No, I'm just not obsessed with NOT doing it if the case called for it.


BTW go Ron Paul....

 

Are you for Ron Paul?

if you are hold on, my universe as I know it is about to collapse.

According to the troll I NEVER argue against Ron Paul supporters, plus I always take the 'popular side' by putting my finger in the wind. Sure doesn't appear I'm on the popular side now, but of course I also 'have it both ways' and argue both sides, now I'm seriously confused. How can I have it both ways and argue on both sides if I always take the 'popular side'

Damnit now I'm going to have a break down, I might in fact know more about myself than the troll knows about me!

 

Ron Paul supports my position on bitch slapping women gang members on subways who terrorize innocent men!

Go RP!

 

I'm not for hitting anyone.. But the guy has a right to defend himself..

Grim you keep banging on about not hitting "chicks" It sounds like in your opinion its perfectly fine for those "chicks" to punch, kick and do whatever with no recourse.. For me this doesn't fit in the same category as having a row with your GF, where physical violence would be totally unacceptable.. This is a gang attack.. You criticize the guy for being totally submissive but at the same time if he retaliated you would criticize for hitting a woman.. As for taking the guy gang member out, I'm sure that the girls are just going to stand aside and let you get on with it

It would be interesting to get a woman perspective on this..

 

It's a gang because why, you say it is?

Of course it's not fine for the 'chicks' to be hitting the guy, there however is what 1 tiny little girl hitting him, 1 girl somewhat getting into it, 1 guy hitting him as well, 1 girl trying to pull those back.

Submissive as in attitude, you do know the difference do you not? You can stand tall w/o attacking a woman, or anyone for that matter.

You take out their backup, the guys who they are drawing power from, yes 9 times out of 10 the woman will fall as well.

Attacking the woman will get you what? Leaving yourself wide open for the guy 'plus the other guy in the back' to get pissed off and hit you when you can't see, plus the other 2 girls who arent' doing much, in fact one trying to stop the shit.

Seriously do you even think first? On and on about hitting woman, but yet no logic in it at all.

Even if you're ok with hitting woman, in this case it would be the wrong thing to do, even for 'defending' yourself. It would result in you getting your ass kicked, not just slightly slapped like a little bitch.

 

If you ride the subway don't mess with people. Otherwise take a taxi.

 

It's a gang because there are a few of them..

I understand what submissive means.. The gang picked on someone they perceived as weak..
You say you can stand tall w/o attacking a woman, Nobody is taking about attacking woman, This is about somebody defending themselves..

Your whole argument seems to be based around "If you can't take a few slaps and kicks of a gang of women you're a wimp" and "if you defend yourself, you're some kind of woman beating scumbag"

I far from OK about hitting women.. These girls want to act like guys, Treat them as such..

I personally don't think i would have got into that situation because I wouldn't have asked them to stop smoking.. It would have been easier to move further down the carriage..

 

A few people together is hardly a gang, not in the common used form for the word.

Anyways, you can stand tall and be intimidating to the point she would not attack you. To defend you also do not have to hit, especially when it's an itsy bitsy little girl.

Still on and on about woman, treating them like guys, yet there was a guy there.

Nope lets not take the guy out, lets bypass all logic, and harp on treating woman as guys, harp on hitting them. Sorry but honestly it appears there are a bunch of pussies in this thread, all big talk about how they'd 'defend/attack' the woman, but somehow nothing about the guy..

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang

I agree you can stand tall and be intimidating to the point that you wouldn't be attacked but you shouldn't have to.

 

Ahh yes and the more common 'gang' term that is used, what most think of is

http://www.answers.com/gang&r=67

That is why I stated

Most people do not think of a simple group when the term gang is used, they think of a criminal gang.

Yet again my point is to talk about attacking the woman is just stupid on any level, even if you're ok with hitting woman, in this instance it would be stupid. Yet the 'cough' men in this thread talk nothing about hitting the guy, only the girls. I wonder why that is..

You shouldn't have to be intimidating to not be attacked, but it's aok to beat some woman in self defense. Yeah.. Ok

 

Your source.. http://www.answers.com/gang&r=67

2 A group of adolescents who band together, especially a group of delinquents.

You point appears to be take the guy out and its all over.. Maybe that true.. I would rather not have to hit anyone which is what to guy does and gang mentality takes over.. I in fact had to watch the video again because i thought the guy that was with them was sitting.. he seams to be trying to stop it at the end..

 

Of course it is depending on the situation. Ex: a 120 pound skinny Asian guy is being pounded for no reason by a 250LB black woman. ( I use those examples because there are definitive differences in body sizes and strengths between races)

Big strong tough guy GRIM says: just restrain her! No problem grow some balls dude!

That may be ok for you but not for him. I would give the guy a hand and smack her or restrain her myself whatever it takes. ( Im a big strong tough guy like GRIM)

Grims answer: Jump in a give the little guy a second good beating cause hitting a girly is for girly man.

Grims impression of women is that they are weak delicate creatures who can't defend themselves and men are all big and macho with large balls.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

 

Yes I know there are multiple definitions for 'gang' yet again the common definition of gang that MOST people think of is a criminal gang.

BTW adolescents, you might want to look up the definition on that as I doubt those in the video were 'adolescents'

No my point is the people on here are all jumping to hit a little tiny woman, but have no balls to take on the guy. My point is the guy on at least 2 occassions is punching the 'victim' My point is that in order to win the fight you must take out the big guy, going after the tiny little girl would open yourself up to a world of hurt.

Under no logic would hitting the girl be the best thing, even if you're ok with hitting a woman. You can yet again detain without hitting, what is so hard to understand about that?

Nope Twalker likes to put things into other peoples mouths.
If you had a little tiny Asian going against a huge black woman as you put it, the tiny asian would be best to outrun her. You don't honestly think she could outrun him do you?

You're going to have to do better then that.

Yet again you guys are all for beating/ ohyeah 'defending' against this tiny little woman, yet no outrage of the guy also in on it, or chants to defend against him.



BTW I love how you try to bring EXTREMES that are like what .00001% of all instances to justify in an instance that it does not apply to.

 

How old would you say they were..

 

#1 it doesn't matter as I have clearly stated the 'common' use of the word, which is Criminal groups/gangs.
#2 Without any proof there is trully no way to know, but I'd say just out of highschool to early 20's. Pretty hard to tell, especially to the point of calling them such.

 

Grim . .Sorry, haven't learned to negotiate this site yet.

I wouldn't report the smoker outside just because one of them could be my son. I could kill him.

But inside, you can't believe "smoking sections" actually are blocking smoke fromt he non smoking sections, could you?

I've seen two friends die a slow, painful death from smoking. Young people have to clue yet.