Beating Wikipedia, MSN, Etc. ARRGGHH!!

This is sort of a dirt technique, but..

what if you link to the wiki article from a bunch of black listed and warez sites?

 

Wouldn't do much at all but be a waste of time, Wiki has to link back to feel the negative wieght or everyone would do this to competitors in SERPs.

 

Essence of truth here. Restricted sites wouldn't work, but red flagged sites would. Some day, if you have a site you don't care about, search google for "viagra guestbook" (w/o quotes), and post your link to a few dozen. Watch yourself run backwards through the rankings. I know in theory, and technically, it shouldn't be like that, but in reality, it is. I know it first hand.

 

It does not work this way, if that was the case you would be able to attack your competitors quite easily.

http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66356

 

I'm well aware of that page. But I've also sat at the computer with that page open, then right next to that page, my ranking page.
Remember, I'm a blackhat, so link spam is an acceptable method here. I've ran this test with 4 different domains, similar content, clean history, only 1 or 2 inlinks. All sites on the same topic, ranking within 2 of eachother.
List 1: Guestbooks/Message Boards, the full list. Approximately 180k entries.
List 2: Message Boards only, any PR below 1 eliminated. Eliminating the spammed out ones+guestbooks. Approximately 100k-120k entries.
When list 1 was sent it resulted in a drop of 130 for one site, and another site going clear off the top 1000.
When list 2 was sent, it results in an increase of 110, and 150. The one that increased 150 was frontpaged.

I'm struggling to find a reason for that, but really, all that happened was that the super spammy pages were eliminated. That was the only difference, and why I've come to believe in red-flagged pages.

 

Hey we could always stuff some affilate cookies onto Wilki!!!!