Like most everyone, I like the top one best. The other one is just much too colorful. Holy shmokes! Mine is about 2" x 3", full-color, and it only cost $60!
BW with a little colour might be good. The best way to know if you really want that tatto is imagine it on a 60 yr old, because you'll be that age some day. Make sure you really want it before commiting.
Thanks a lot everybody, Im going ot get it priced up in a bit to see how much and how long it will take etc I have thought about it like that and who knows i might love it when im 60 but i might not but my attitue is when im that old am i really gonna care about anything like that. Plus thats why im getting it on my leg since if i want i can cover it up Thanks
I'd go with the top one. Just make sure it's what you want. I got my two when I was 17 and have no regrets because they both mean something to me.
It's hard to say what you will want or not want when you are 60. Make sure it's something that you want now. When you are 60 you'll know it was something that you really wanted back when you were 20 (or however old you are now). The tatt that I have now isn't something that I would get now. But it's something that to me will always symbolize what I wanted when I got it. It speaks to who I was, and where I was, at that time. I don't really like it now, but I liked it then and I'm fine with it now. Now that I type all that out, it doesn't make sense. But it works when it's in my head....
Still looks a little raw in a couple of those photos. Give us a longer shot with more of your leg so we can see how it looks in relation to the body. Easiest way to tell is to see a 60 year old with a tatts and think 'ooh they look cool'.
I will take a new one in a couple of days because its still pretty red Also the guy said he tattoo'd a 70 year old man once and he just bleed all over