Gtech take your meds. I already explained Blow Back had nothing to do with RP, I have used that term for years. It actually for me comes from my young and stupid days of experimenting with pot if you must know Care to admit OWNED yet again.j Blow Back or Blow Through is when pot/ash comes through the pipe, an unintended consequence, nothing to do with RP. You are the only one for hookers, I'm sure they love you, they get paid and virtually no penetration! Supporters of RP, someone who supports all American citizens rights under the constitution to me does not shock me one bit or push me away from RP at all. Someone with this stance, very similiar to mine is going to get a few bad apples, every candidate does. But letting a rapist out to rape and murder by your own hand, to me that's 1000x worse
Ah, I was hoping for something a little better. You're getting too bitter. Would I be out of line, if I asked you to try again? Could you do a little better? Wait, I know, you could have questions for RP like you pretend to about your country and Iraq? That would prove you were not a hypocrite, right? One mulligan for my bumpy poobah, because I'm a nice guy
grim, Are these legitimate questions, considering the "coincidences," and why do you not demand these questions be answered, but demand rumors about other candidates be answered? As I pointed out, I believe EVERY candidate should answer to their controversies. You claim to be a "free thinker" but then go against the grain when it comes time to demonstrate such. Agenda? Demand questions for one side, but not the one you support/defend? Are you not man enough to demand the same for the candidate you support, but don't support? Instead of addressing them, you've wasted all your time attacking me (which I don't mind, I find the banter humorous) and then, much to my very surprise, actually went out of your way to demonstrate this very hypocrisy.
Gtech I have not put my support behind Ron Paul, out of those out there he is the closest person to my positions, I can and will admit that. I however do have questions, such as his stance on the Iraq war and bringing the troops home immediately. I already brought that up. It is you who continues to bash RP without looking at your own candidate. It was not rumor BTW, only the 'reason' for why he did it was unknown Better, seriously? I answered truthfully What 'better' could you have hoped for, oh I know something you could twist. Show me something that shows Ron Paul actually supporting any of these groups, something at his hand, you know like YOUR candidate did with the rapist. Otherwise it's just common sense, all candidates are going to draw bad apples. Someone for freedom for all US citizens and freedom of speach is going to draw some lunatics, that is simply to be expected. Would I like him to publicly state he's against such stances? Sure, why not. Does he need to? I don't see why he needs to as nothing links him to these groups from what I have read other than some of them supporting him. You're using 'some' of his supporters as a way to attack him, why not use the person and his actions instead? You know 'cough' rape and murder. You are the one who continues to make these threads and accusations Gtech, YOU not me, the only possible hypocrite in such an instance is you, and you do fit the bill. I am not going around trashing a single candidate every chance I get now am I?
More deflection. No surprise. Your source said "rumors." Why you deny that is beyond me. You posted it. Maybe you should actually read what you post, for a change. You continue to support RP and have. Everyone knows it. And then you go and create a thread about another candidate, on MY BEHALF, to prove your own hypocrisy! You demand answers for one candidate, yet have a different standard for YOUR candidate. In fact, you won't even acknowledge they are legitimate questions. No doubt, that "agenda" you don't have, is shining brightly, yet again. Again, I thank you for all the effort you are giving me. I could do it without you, but it's so much more fun when you do all the work for me! Very gratifying too. No questions for your candidate on a serious issue, but no problem with questions for someone else's candidate. About what I expected, from you.
Please, try to be more accurate when making your statements: The Explosive, Devastating Case Against 911 Truth (written by me)
He is not my candidate, yet again more mistruths coming from Gtech. You like lying for your agenda don't you? You suggested to me, surely appeared to be as such for a new thread as you would not answer in this thread. You love bashing RP, but have no problem with direct actions by your candidate that let a rapist out to murder. RP is not my candidate yet again, I guess you should clean out your ears of the built up wax so you can hear Even so I do question and have questions for him, I have already said as much, but nope more lying by you. I question his stance on pulling the troops out of Iraq, but yep keep bypassing that as it doesnt' fit your lie filled agenda. I do not demand questions from your candidate, as stated that was only to prove what a hypocrite you are, it was very easy BTW. The rumor you keep spouting, where does the story say anything about rumor? More lies by Gtech to make it AOK for his candidate to let a rapist out, illegally I might add as it appears to rape and murder. More on the subject http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/14/huckabee_could_face_hurdles_from_the_past/ Where is the 'rumor'
Right there, in your story: Rumor - a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts However, unlike you, I believe EVERY candidate should answer to their controversies over their campaign. You've clearly demonstrated that you do not believe RP should. In fact, you've exhausted yourself again, supporting someone (or as in past, groups of people) then claim you do not support them. If I had thousands and thousands of neo-nazis, anti-semites, troofers, conspiracy nuts and other undesirables latching onto me, I'd be wondering WTF was up. I'd also be happy, if you were supporting me in the same way. Thanks for confirming your hypocrisy again, and making it perfectly simple to illustrate. I believe EVERY candidate should answer to these types of controversies, you do not. Way to step up to the plate and be a "man!"
I agree there is no rumor GRIM. Huckabee commuted his sentence, after the rape victim confronted him on it.
Gtech there is no 'rumor' the only thing that is unclear is to why he did it according to the story. Who cares why he did it, he in fact did it. --edit I've answered you Gtech, yet you continue like a droan. Any candidate gets lunatics, one who is for freedom of speach for EVERYONE is going to get a bunch. That's all it is, yet you make it out to be more than it is. You attack the man for his supporters, instead of his actions. You know like your candidate who let a man out who raped a 17 year old to rape again and murder. Yeah almost the same You can not control who supports you, you however can control your actions.
That would make rumors out of the reasons why he did. Again, I point out your double standards and hypocrisy. I believe EVERY candidate, including Huckabee (and he apparently is answering those that ask about an incident that took place 23 years ago) should answer for these controversies. Huckabee admitted he made a mistake. Seems like a better man than RP, who blamed his mistakes on a "ghostwriter" and for some reason, seems to be attracting these same people to this day. You're just not man enough to accept your own hypocrisy. And to that, I say "thank you" for doing all my work for me.
Ron Paul views people as individuals, not collective groups. It is not possible for a true individualist to be racist.
Sorry, rp supporters make up claims as they go along. I could just as easily say: "Huckabee views people as individuals, not collective groups." Anyone can make up their own facts. Ron paul needs to answer the legitimate questions surrounding the controversy of the overwhelming flood of support from racist neo-nazi groups, troofers, conspiracy nuts. My bumpy poobah demanded such of Huckabee, and I agree with him. He, and others, should be asking these questions as well. If they were really sincere about him. I know if my candidate had all this crap going on, I'd want to know WTF was up and what message is he sending, that makes these racist groups flock to him. But that's just me. Some would turn a blind eye and sweep it under the rug.
Yet again who cares why he did it? Oh so he's sorry he let a rapist out to rape and kill someone, yeah that makes him a saint Gtech take your meds, seriously! The only reason I even brought up your candidate was to show YOUR hypocrisy. Can you not comprehend simple logic? Is the 2nd grade to advanced for you? Help me out here at what level this discussion should take place so you understand. You want every candidate to answer, yet you only question RP for some of his supporters, no others, not your own who let a rapist out to rape and kill and then dismiss that and call him the better man. Wow give me a break I actually like Huckabee in some parts, he could have been a possible on my list especially his stance on treatment for drug users. Letting a person out who raped a 17 year old however to rape and kill again turned my stomach so much that there is NO WAY in hell I could support him. Glad to see what kind of person you are that it doesnt' bug you.
Ah, fresh hypocrisy! Always makes a tasty late night snack. So once again, my little grimlin is demonstrating support for someone he doesn't support, and non-support for someone he probably doesn't support, and has one standard for one side, and another standard for his side, that he is clearly supporting/defending, but says he doesn't support him. Can we get john kerry in here to decipher all that nuance? Once again, I believe EVERY candidate should answer to these controversies. Clearly grim doesn't support such, with his candidate that he doesn't support. I need someone to support me like that! Be a man, for once, grim. You demand Huckabee answer (as do I), but refuse to demand such of your own candidate that you are supporting, but claim not to support because you are afraid of commitment. That, my bumpy poobah, is hypocrisy at it's finest.
We need someone who claims not to support RP, but actually does, to come in and be Mr. Popularity so his ego can be stroked. Any suggestions, grim?
Gtech are you seriously this much of an idiot? I am suddenly picturing you wearing one of those special hats The hypocrisy is yours, Mr bash RP every chance you get but never question your own candidate. I have not pledged my support to any candidate yet again, I however will throw shit away which is your posts, they are the same as shit! It would not matter if you were posting untruths about Obama FFS! If it's shit and I see it as shit I will throw it away! That does not equal me supporting the person! Great way to try to hide your hypocrisy by claiming to turn it around. So you don't mind that he let a man out who raped a 17 year old, to rape again and murder? Wow normally you'd call someone like that a 'terrorist supporter' as I'm sure the rape victims were 'terrorized' yet more hypocrisy from Gtech.
Sorry, not taking red herrings tonight. Should RP answer legitimate questions about a multitude of anti-semitic, neo nazi, troofer, anarchist and conspiracy groups that are flocking to his campaign? Or his RP beyond reproach?
Yet you have been owned on the whole 'popular' thing time and time again, but that doesn't stop a crusty old dog from barking more lies. Lie enough and you believe the lie, you're living proof of it.