I agree. We need a thread on other candidates as well. I'm sure their supporters would like the opportunity to defend their positions.
You've been a paul supporter for quite a while now. But then again, at least on this forum, it's what's popular, so it goes without saying. If neo-nazi groups, anti-semites, troofers, anarchists and racists are your bag of tea, I can see clearly why he's looking good to you For someone who pretends to be against something under the guise of asking questions and demands questions be answered, it's rather ironic, isn't it? Hypocrisy!
Ron's support includes a wide range of people who love freedom. This is an honest answer to your "Open Letter"
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/05/19/trutheriness-and-ron-paul/ http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2007/06/15/the_conservative_case_against_ron_paul I await the rp archive copy and paste
Is that the answer he'll be using to dismiss all these fringe group support? What's really amazing is, I see some of these same people here. You guys better start working harder on covering up your true feelings
Four rp supporters, and no one has addressed the legitimate questions that are based upon real observations. Nope, instead, everyone is taking issue with the messenger. How comforting
Backing someone up makes me a supporter? Really now? Wow I guess since I have backed Bush up I support Bush, since I have backed Clinton up I backed Clinton. Ohyeah I never did So far I do not support anyone, out of the field though I am leaning more and more to Paul, I have yet to lend my support to him though. What's popular, lol Gtech do you want to be OWNED yet again? I was anti War when it was not popular, I do not follow any crowd unlike you. I am pro gun, not very popular on DP. I am anti gay's having children, not very popular here, I do nothing by 'popular' give me a break. You've been shown to be the hypocrite you are, and now this lame attempt to change the subject
Yes, it does. Are you not man enough to admit it? You defend him at every opportunity. I know, I know, you are never man enough to take a position without having a backup position that can scapegoat you, because you are afraid of being owned. Typical grim! Still nothing about all these legitimate questions? I wonder why?
Darren D. writes: Friday, October, 26, 2007 7:40 PM "Michael Medved Has Lost It Micheal I no longer listen to your show because of the unfair disdain shown towards Dr. Paul. When he was on your show you were hostile towards him and did your best to paint him as a 9/11 truther...." ~~~~~~~~~ Dr. Paul has repeatedly made comments about "the 19 thugs, mostly Saudi" You lie by calling him a "troother"
Sniff, sniff, I smell popularity! Oh, that's just grim's feet, showing up wherever something popular is to boost his ego!
as far as the 'michelle malkin' article is concerned, i only needed to read a part of it. Ron Paul has openly said on alex jone's show i believe that he does not support the 9/11 conspiracy claims. HE OPENLY STATED IT. i don't feel like finding the file, you can if you want. but i'm pretty sure something isn't matching up here. this will be the reason Ron Paul wins because his opponents' supporters are so busy trying to accuse Paul of random things while they have done nothing to spread the word of their own candidate. o and as far as the other article goes, summarize that for me if you want me to read it because it looks hella boring.
Ron's support includes a wide range of people who love freedom. This is an honest answer to your "Open Letter"
I defend when I see 'bogus' shit posted, you know what you're good at I actually do not defend him at every opportunity, nice try though. I for one do not support getting out of Iraq such as he proposes, bet you didn't know that. Ohyeah I have posted I don't believe it would be the correct move before You've never owned me Gtech, you however are the poster child of being owned.
And yet Ron Paul has answered for the ghostwriter articles that appeared in his newsletter. He's taken responsibility for them, even though his record indicates no such racist beliefs held personally. It must really burn people who play the race card (even the die hard neocons have for the most part surrendered the point) that he is polling well with NH blacks (22%) more than any other Republican. And that he was the star of the Minority debate on PBS. And that he has written numerous articles on racism. http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul381.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul68.html Of course Dr. Paul was the only Republican to speak to the Arab American Institute last week. And was well received to tremendous applause. But still, some folks will try to paint him as a nazi supporter, a racist etc. Slander seems to be the only form of intellectualism still thriving in the neocon camp.
And to think, Darren could have used that space and time to answer why all these neo-nazi groups, anti-semites, troofers (you are a troofer too, as I recall, gemini) are backing this man in droves. Gee, I wonder why legitimate questions are off limits for ron paul. I mean, he stands for "freedom," right? But his supporters don't like the tough questions? The same supporters who've spent the last eight years "smearing" Bush and other politicians? My oh my, how the spider comes back to bite one in the ass!
He blamed it on someone else, even though it was HIS newsletter that he signed. Oh, wait, I have a good one that my grimlin friend likes to use all the time. I can demonstrate two bits of hypocrisy in one with this one: "So you blindly believe everything you've been told?" LMAO!
Anti war NOT popular from the beginning, I however was GTECH OWNED Anti Gays having kids NOT popular on DP GTECH OWNED Calling both sides when they are wrong definitely NOT popular, GTECH OWNED among others, but yeah just the popular. Give me a break Gtech, I have been in countless debate threads with you and your chearleaders and nobody else. I surely love how Gtech is the king or is that queen of twisting away from the facts to change the story when he is OWNED!
it seems like the only argument you have against Paul is saying he has neo-nazi supporters, that's not only a weak argument but a liberal one. remember the picture that fades from Bush to Hitler the liberals would use? same scare tactic maybe?