You have such a good reputation for honest debate, I'm almost flattered by your comments. Note: Some (a lot?) of the mass-murder is done by our US military. The rest is from the civil war we helped start in Iraq.
I agree. I don't believe he places any value on credibility or integrity though, so it pretty much exempts him from accountability for making such absurd statements and "allegations." He simply conveyed that he doesn't care about our military, making his assertion that he cares about our troops null and void. He doesn't want them home because he cares about them. And he doesn't take issue with terrorists that blow up Iraqis. So obviously what he's pretending to care about, and what he really cares about, are two different beasts. edit: yep, it's the terrorists he's concerned about. Just like a ron paul supporter, too
"Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder ABC News ((Didn't your hear about it???)) "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder "Shock and Awe" is Mass-Murder
Cool! So Ron Paul supporters are not concerned about troops coming home at all. In fact, they hate them. Now that's what I wanted to confirm. And it's not the iraqis they care about, so that leaves only one group they care about. Nice work, gemini!
"Look in the mirror and tell me Just what you see What have the years of your life Taught you to be?" -Kerry Livgren
Poor gemini just exposed himself again. ron paul supporters are so easy to expose. Not an ounce of common sense, just wrecked his entire "cause."
An insurgent wouldn't be killing his own people. Is that too hard to understand? These TERRORISTS kill anyone and everyone from police (Iraqis) to the children (Iraqis) they sometimes get 'lucky' and actually kill a soldier, but it doesn't seem to be their main goal. Don't take away credit where credit is due, some of these guys die blowing themselves up in a public place, at least give them credit for the people they kill or injure - alah akbar pbuh...
Dude there are kids reading these forums, you shouldn't post torn apart body pictures unblurred, you already make your point which everybody figures what you're talking about without those anyway.
Did you look in the mirror? Are you OK?? BTW: Ron Paul wants to support and honor the troops by bringing them home. Please, admit you are mistaken (in your earlier comments), or the world will see you as a liar.
If their parents allow them to access the internet, they will eventually see things. ~~~ What about the kids in Iraq, who are suffering and dying from our illegal invasion?? ~~~ Edit: Pro-peace people have a right to show pro-war people the result of their hate and lies.
How so? Because you said it? Obviously you portray a different premise for ron paul than what you are exposing yourself for here. You're not helping the cause Bite your tongue, my lady.
Another one lost to the progaganda machine, at least GTech has a mind of his own and doesn't spew out retoric. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism
I agree with debunked. He's very much correct. Terrorists in iraq were (until the surge started working) killing enormous numbers of civilians. All along, those who are agenda driven and typically anti-US oriented, have given these terrorists a complete pass. Now, Iraqis are fighting these very terrorists and winning against them. Things are changing. Yes, it upsets and disappoints some that only want failure, but the facts remain...things are changing. Iraqis are stepping up to the plate, and the surge plan is working.
Thanks for posting the wiki definition, it should help you understand my post. Now I have to ask if you missed reading either my post or your link? Which did you miss?
Little late to the party, but I do believe this is incorrect. At least how many of the pages you can find this information on, they do in fact count the deaths even when the wounded soldier dies elsewhere, even in the US. What isn't accounted for however are all the brain dead soldiers, soldiers who are so torn apart and according to the medical teams themselves only survived due to advanced medical tech, other wars they would have died, this has kept the death toll much lower than it could be 'thank god' however I have heard so many of these same med teams say many of these men/women were so bad they are not sure they should have been saved. Good as dead but counted as wounded, not dead. I am not for the war, I have been against it from the beginning. I however even do not feel we can come out right at this moment. As far as the surge, great news that there is less deaths. Time will only tell if it's the 'end all' or if it's simply a short lived situation. What happens in the north, what happens when or if Al Sadr decides to take up arms again, what happens if in so many cases could swing the area into more chaos than there has been before. I am hopeful that it's working, I however am not naive either In any event any less US deaths is a good thing.
The surge is working and I plan a new post that will disappoint and upset some again. Of course, no one ever said it was the "end all" that some might dishonesty claim, just numbers that show it's working. They only have hypotheticals to try and take away the successes of our troops.
Gtech nobody can be naive to see it as definite proof it's an end all. If you seriously want to be that naive by all means be so. It is far from proof that it's an end all, going to fix everything and win the war. Lets hope it does, hell I'm right there with you hoping it does. There are way, way to many variables that could happen to call it an end all. Logic such as you continue to use is what got us into this mess in the first damn place. You have to get so damn hostile unless someone is totally, 100% on your side, how dare anyone question anything. IMHO it's pretty pathetic and doesn't show a very good character