that is the figure over a 10 years collective span, what is important is the number of deaths over the 10 years, is 53,000+
Something is still not adding up... today there are a little over 400,000,000 people living in the US... are you telling me that in that 10 year period 422,470,068 people died? I think their was some sort of end user error on the site, or the site has some sort of error in their data. Whatever the cause.. while I will agree there does need to be some sort of intervention with the gun happy Americans.. not all of them, just the ones who like to fire their guns at people... I simply do not think those figures are correct.
guys actually it is 301 M....dunno what kind of numbers on that picture are shown. hehe, the same talk is there as well, funny how many ppl are banned on that topic Actually, I would believe them having S-300, Iran is our close friend on Caspian and now they are dividing Caspian sea. The reason I would believe that they can sell S-300, is because there's a new one S-400 already developed and is protecting Moscow only for now. The upgrade process in other regions is going through.
the figure 822,***,*** divided by 10 = 82 million i guess is the number of children in that age range per year, so now it does make sense. and the 53,000 does sound like the correct figure. as children are born and enter the age range, others turn adults and leave the age range, i guess to do it over a 10 year period they have to times it by 10 to get an aggregate figure of the child population, in 1988 it might only be 78 million in 1998 it might be 90 million. US popularion is 301,139,947 with 82 million kids that leaves 219 million adults the figures are correct another 50,000 plus children are going to die at the point of a gun in the usa in the next 10 years
drmike, give up dude. She made you look really stupid on the first page and you haven't recovered since. You not knowing that they meant a land based attack where they would fire rockets at opposing forces just helped her cause. But then you had the audacity to attack her for not knowing the difference between a rocket and a missle.... the hilarity ensued from there. A rocket wouldn't reach across lake michigan, much less an ocean there genius boy..
N_F_S : I am sure we would see those S-300 in couple of "propaganda" videos from Iran. I only saw TORs when they made that big military exercise couple of months ago braging about their military capabilities. On the other side maybe they left this as a surprise and if they really have some working S-300 US will never attack ....
yeah, right. If you know her, she's good at taking piss of someone and talking off topic. iatbm, lets just hope that there wont be a need to use them at all
Actually..... I don't think she made me look too stupid on the first page... but thanks for the put down Land-Based attack? They are going to fire rockets, some with a range of up to 250 kilometers... what is hilarious about that? I never attacked her for not knowing the difference... she attacked me for accidetly putting missile into the OP instead of rockets... I never attacked her... simply asked that if she was so not worried about these rockets that she go and take the place of someone in the armed forces who is sitting at a base within their reach who is worried about them Lasty... Lake Michigan?? Oceans?? who said they were firing them across Lake Michigan or any ocean? Iran said they will fire them at enemy bases within reach (250km) of their country... that range takes quite a few of the over 200,000 US soliders in the area (160,000 in Iraq, 40,000 in the Persian Gulf, 25,000 in Afghanastan, 20,000 in mideast waters) All in all, all you really did was a accomplish a mediocre attack on me, thankfully I am nice and will not retaliate against you, just simply correct any errors you make. Have a great day
Well missile is kind of rocket just to clear things out Rocket is unguided ( which does not mean you cannot aim target ) Missile is guided rocket There are other differences but this kind of sums it up for DP
Dude, I didn't want to jump in but you just made it hilarious! A rocket (not missile) does not have a range of 250 KM. A Short range missile comes in to that range. A rocket hardly has a range of 5-35 KMs. And yes, rocket is mainly used for Land based, Line of sight attacks... And ohhh In case you are taking Chaharbaghi too serious read it again - The Man is simply running his mouth, in order to scare people...ahem..no offense.. like you.
Does he really need to elaborate? And no, I am not scared of it... I feel bad for the people that may be in harms way... and I think some people here... ahem.. no offense.. like you, are overly eager to play things like this down from the safety of your house, yet would probably have a much different stance if you were over there within reach of any rockets of missiles. Also.. you mentioned that rockets can only reach 5-25Km's and then post a quote of someone referring to "rockets with a range of 250 kilometers"... just thought I would point that out.
Dude, Run... The sky is falling.... Okay... no kidding.. Give me a single example of a rocket(not missile) that has an effective range of 250 KMs. Search, the entire Internet is yours.... If I only need to run my mouth I can say - "Listen dude, if you fart ever again I will fire and shove 20,000 rockets with a range of 1000 KMs up in your ass within the first minute of your fart"... But then again, I'm only running my mouth here......
Are they still flying those F-14's we sent them? <edit> nevermind... http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/
If you think their rockets are so funny why dont you go over and personally block them from hitting anyone... that way all those over their will be safe and you will be happy by prooving your point that Iran's armery is nothing but a joke.
iatbm... did ya really have to post the mopad picture haha its not helping the cause that Iran's army is dangerous haha.