We should not be scared of this man!

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Robert Allen, Oct 21, 2007.

  1. #1
    http://www.postimees.ee/191205/gfx/2518843a6a704d8230.jpg

    I don't consider him a threat at all.

    (Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad)

    Why are America interfering with their Nuclear program?

    If America wanted to make a power program using nuclear reactors, Iran wouldn't say no.

    Why should America tell Iran what to do?

    Rob
     
    Robert Allen, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  2. samantha pia

    samantha pia Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,639
    Likes Received:
    482
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #2
    you'll find it is not about having nuclear reactors, it's about the type they are wanting. Iran can have the type that can not produce weapons grade plutonium and no-one would mind, but Iran want the type that gives them weapons grade plutonium, thats why the west and other parts of the world are pissed.
     
    samantha pia, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  3. iul

    iul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #3
    but doesn't the west also have nukes? so why shouldn't Iran have them too then?
     
    iul, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  4. samantha pia

    samantha pia Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,639
    Likes Received:
    482
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #4
    because there is no need for Iran to have them, the nations that have them are stable, unlike Iran. there is no need to have anymore on the planet.
     
    samantha pia, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  5. max pain

    max pain Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,179
    Likes Received:
    521
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #5
    Why do anyone need nukes in the first place... the ones with the Nukes pose a threat to the ones without them as they can erase them off the map with the push of a button... so wouldn't it be better if all of them got rid off it ;)
     
    max pain, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  6. iul

    iul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #6
    who are you to determine other peoples needs?
     
    iul, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  7. samantha pia

    samantha pia Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,639
    Likes Received:
    482
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #7
    a sane person, who are you to say they need nukes? all they want is the power so they say, if thats is the case, they do not need a plant that can make nukes now do they? :rolleyes:
     
    samantha pia, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  8. DevilHellz

    DevilHellz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    141
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #8
    This argument is getting pretty old.
    Do you have common sense ?
    If you do, you understand the possible consequences of Iran having nukes.
    I'll give this example again, as i did in another thread:

    Why shouldn't Iran have the right for it and other do ?
    Think of it as life in society. Certain rights are being overruled by other rights. The safety of 2 or more countries is at stake because of Iran's reputation and untrustworthiness. They built their name like that. They finance terrorist organizations.

    A situation where you and a guy named Bob go out to buy a gun.
    Now Bob is known to be quite unstable.
    They test both of you if you can carry a gun, and decide that you can buy one, but Bob cannot.
    Bob has a right to make a gun license tho, but he cannot! Why ? Because he is unstable.
    Would you want someone like Bob to carry a gun ? Of course not, because it endangers many people around him, including you.
    Iran, in this example, is very unstable.
     
    DevilHellz, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  9. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Exactly, it's a shame how many people would actually hand out guns at an asylum though.
     
    Toopac, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  10. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #10
    Let's not think of it as society. :rolleyes:

    In a society, people have agreed to work with each other and decision making body has been chosen by the members of the society. A person can be denied the right to buy a gun because of the laws which has been agreed on by the citizens of a country.

    Who has agreed that USA should be the rule making body of the world? Let's think of it as school bully situation when the bully has a knife that threatens other students with and doesn't want any other student to buy a knife because then they can not be bullied in the same way. :)
     
    gworld, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  11. guru-seo

    guru-seo Peon

    Messages:
    2,509
    Likes Received:
    152
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Why would we allow India to develop nuclear technology with our assistance? What a double standard. Who the hell are we to dictate who gets to play with nukes and who doesn't? We should either have no one develop them or have everyone develop them, it is only logical that if your enemy has nukes you should have them as well to defend yourself if you have to. No?
     
    guru-seo, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  12. bfebrian

    bfebrian Peon

    Messages:
    1,246
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    about nukes...
    why not EVERY COUNTRY NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE NUKES...
    the one that already have, MUST destroy they nukes....
    so we don't have any argument about nukes...
     
    bfebrian, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  13. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #13
    No one, not even the UN.
     
    guerilla, Oct 21, 2007 IP
  14. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #14
    I still find it utterly astonishing that a country that is so utterly controlled by corrupt scumbags AND being the only country in the entire world that has used a nuclear weapon on another country can preach to any other country in the world about having nuclear weapons.

    The sooner these countrys get nukes the better, as it acts as a fantastic deterrent and prevents Mr Cheney and his f*cked up cabal from ruining another country.
     
    AGS, Oct 21, 2007 IP
    leet likes this.
  15. iatbm

    iatbm Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    352
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #15
    I can't believe there are people who say Iran should not develop weapons because they do not deserve it since they are unstable country. What an ignorant statement !
    Get out of the cave people.
    I hope they get weapons as soon as possible but sadly it will be another 15-20 years until they get some :D
     
    iatbm, Oct 22, 2007 IP
  16. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Iran won't get those weapons, it's impossible with so many countries against such a program & the US is willing to take action if needed, so i don't think they will have nukes in the next 100 years:p
     
    Toopac, Oct 22, 2007 IP
  17. iatbm

    iatbm Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    352
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #17
    Be reasonable. US can do nothing about. We see them strugling in Iraq and Afghan .... We saw how much influence US lost with Mjanmar affair recently when China stepped in ....

    It all really depends on Russia. If they show green light then there is not much anyone can do. Russians are building nuclear facilities for them so.....
     
    iatbm, Oct 22, 2007 IP
  18. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #18
    If he wants nukes so bad the USA should just give him some. Simple answer. Less nukes in the usa and ....... figure out the rest.
     
    debunked, Oct 22, 2007 IP
  19. iatbm

    iatbm Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    352
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #19
    Sure I read somewhere there are ways to do that :D
     
    iatbm, Oct 22, 2007 IP
  20. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #20
    yup, like pushing the button that send them there. Simple isn't it?!

    Drop the nukes right on his lap. Something tells me he would complain about it all the way to hell. He will be crying about it for eternity. "boo-hoo, all I wanted was to rid the world of Jews with nukes and someone did it to me first... waaaaaaaaaaaaaa.. alah akbar"
     
    debunked, Oct 22, 2007 IP