Perhaps one day he will claim that he caught Bush posting on online forums.... Meanwhile I see all the 'truthers' avoiding the question put against them.. is it something new?
Psychologically speaking, people who buy into conspiracy theories just tend to be untrusting people in general. Which is ironic because they'd rather trust some idiot who touched a plane once over actual experts in the field. I think it has to do with the idea that people don't like to believe that other people can be evil. They think only governments can be evil. Since this was an evil act and only governments can be evil then that proves that our government was behind it.
911 was nothing but people traveling back in time (from future) to watch us kill each other and play in their newest reality tv show....
What makes you not to answer my questions? You asked me questions, and I was just clearing out the options. Its simple: Do you want theories, or stories? Ahh.. here you go. You believe something and you hold your opinion without proof. But we believe what we see, and we have sown videos, explained in terms of scientific data, and what not. You can't even defend your silly "pan-cake" theory. But still you believe something, and you believe it blindly. I never claimed that Bush did it, or you did it, simply because I have no evidence to support that. But from the evidences that are available to me, it is clear that the building could not have collapsed just because of the plane crash. That's what I have showed numerous times. But you have nothing but abuses to produce. If you want to produce, produce some evidence to explain how a plane can cause a building to collapse.
I know if for sure that they will never change their mind. I was never here to convince them about the truth. I fight on the net for the sake of neutral and rational people. They have abuses, and we have arguments. The neutral and rational people know how to screen out arguments from the abuses.
Wrong!! There are people who are gona believe that a crow is white, if an "expert" tells them. Are you one among them? And there are others who will reject the "white crow" hypothesis, because that is not conformed by evidences. The later ones believe their eyes and brains and chose not to believe jokes. But the former ones chose to believe in jokes(from experts), but do not trust what they can see. Your belief doesn't count. If this is all that you got by reading the whole thread, then sorry I have to doubt that you understand politics a bit, but not science.
Dude dude dude.. What do you have? Theories or stories? Give me whatever you have I'm willing to listen.... I believe what I believe, and I have explained what I believe. So far I have seen no fact, videos, or scientific data that would say otherwise. The Pan cake theory has not been debunked. Besides, I'm asking again, if you think the demolition was controlled give the fucking chain of events, tell me where they set the explosives to bring the building down, how the hell did they control the demolition... WTF!!! What abuse? So asking to prove the statement is abuse now? You are singing a tune that they controlled the demolition, I ask you to prove it. Give the chain of events, give the evidence that they controlled it. Give the insight how did they manage to control the demolition Although I know for a fact, the its highly unlikely that you'll answer the question directly, which is not surprising, cause it's common for all truthers...
I did. I gave you a link to another video. Here are both together. Pod and missile (second plane) - abc: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BN-0K7OhDzQ Pod and missiles (both planes) - cnn: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbCcb6NV8Io How about the Pentagon? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS2rlAoKiy4&NR=1
That's amazing. A missle that looks just like a commercial airliner. Let's try something different. here's a picture of a tomahawk missile: Now, find me a missile that looks like a commercial jet. If it was a missle then what missile was it that hit the towers?
You've still not addressed my question.. The "pod" you see is where the landing gear is stored.. I would imagine the fact that I debunked this is likely the reason no one will address it... Take a look at the video you posted (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbCcb6NV8Io) the part were they show "what a Boeing 767 should look like". The image shown is not the underside of a B-767.... The image I showed you previously is. The image shown by that propaganda artist is a 737... I guess that mystery is officially solved.. What about the Pentagon?
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache...ebaumsworld+FBI+mole&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us I think AGS was banned for being annoying.
Good link in that thread to MIT engineer and research scientist Jeff King discussing 911. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8533904938803031452&pl=true
That was a legendary thread! 11,000+ posts. Shame they deleted it as it's only available as Google cache. Some of my swearing in that thread is of the highest quality ever seen.