I have finished work on my new Quality Rank tool you can check it out Quality Rank(here) Quality rank is a algorithim that ranks the directories according to quality of listings in it .This tool does not depend upon other resources and it ranks directories on the basis of no of links in it.Check your Quality rank and post here for your directoryand also see whether active no of links indexed by our bot is correct. If not you can post here for reindexing your directory To get your directory indexed by our bots you need to submit your directory .you can submit it here if you are interested in sponsoring banners you can look here
Quality Rank : 2/10 Website : http://www.zorg-links.com No of directory links: 76 No of active links in directory : 612(If you are a directory owner and if active links are less than the real active links. Contact us to reindex your directory) thats all wrong data
for what site? First check your site here http://www.bigoole.com/index.php if there are no directory backlinks to your site,there will be no quality rank as it has not been accepted in any directories(In other words ,it has not been reviewed by any directory) The good thing is about this QR is it indicates quality of a site depending upon the quality and quantity of backlinks. My bot might have encountered some problems in indexing your directory I make sure that we index all of the pages. Also QR depends upon the quality of listings in your directory. As far as Zorglinks is considered ,the bot might have indexed your blog also that's why you have got so many active links I persume.
Not sure about these numbers. Am I just looking at it wrong? Quality Rank : 3/10 Website : http://www.bizfire-directory.com No of directory links: 120 No of active links in directory : 96(If you are a directory owner and if active links are less than the real active links. Contact us to reindex your directory)
It depends upon on how much directory backlinks(Reveiwed by directories) of the sites listed in your directory
thats not ideal. A directory of directories will have a high score, as its listed sites will have many backlinks. Perhaps if i add google.com yahoo.com dmoz.com etc to my site it will raise the score....?
I do not think this is accurate either. Quality Rank : 3/10 Website : http://www.leadingdir.com No of directory links: 111 No of active links in directory : 119(If you are a directory owner and if active links are less than the real active links. Contact us to reindex your directory)
Quality Rank : 4/10 Website : http://www.dirqueen.com No of directory links: 40 No of active links in directory : 242(If you are a directory owner and if active links are less than the real active links. Contact us to reindex your directory)
Quality Rank : 5/10 Website : http://www.opendirectorys.com No of directory links: 30 No of active links in directory : 1619(If you are a directory owner and if active links are less than the real active links. Contact us to reindex your directory) Quality Rank : 5/10 Website : http://www.allthelist.com No of directory links: 75 No of active links in directory : 1125(If you are a directory owner and if active links are less than the real active links. Contact us to reindex your directory)
Not at all,simply adding websites will not do any good. We reindex all the directories in 15 days times,If you feel that active links is not accurate ,mention your sitename site:www.domain.com Reindex:Yes The data is as accurate as possible and you can check quality rank for any website also and also you can check your directory backlinks to any site. I think it's pretty much accurate looking at the above data Out index consists of more than 8600 directories and only less than 200-400 would have these problems I persume.
Joeant.com: Quality Rank : 0/10 Website : http://www.joeant.com/ No of directory links: 19 I expected a somewhat higher score ;-) Hugo
The bot did n't index joeant Fully Now We have more than 9 million listings we plan to index major directories (fully) such as Dmoz.org ,Joeant and Yahoo to make SE directory .
Interesting results for dmoz and yahoo. Also, there seems to be a bug with subdomains, or just a display error: type in http://dir.yahoo.com and it returns http://www.ttp://dir.yahoo.com, for instance. I'm noticing low scores across the board, even for those directories I would consider to be big players. So for this tool to work it will need to index a great deal more widely and deeply. That's a major undertaking, so good luck with that.