Are you convinced that the building cannot collapse as it did, just because of the plane crash? Then this question would be worth discussing.
How would I be convinced if there is no alternate factual theory? Just calling it control demolition doesn't make it control demolition. My Question is how did they control the demolition, where did they set the explosives to bring the building down, what was the series of events that brought the building down. Answer these question successfully without any flaw in the theory (Keeping in the mind account of the eye-witnesses) then I will be convinced.. Please go ahead...
Yes, I noticed that after I'd added the links. This one still works. To me, it's the smoking gun. You can see the pod attached to the underside of the aircraft, the flash as the missile fires in the pod, then the explosion as the missile strikes the building immediately before the plane hits. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BN-0K7OhDzQ
What makes you not to the answer the questions straight away? Should I take it as you do not have the answers? I explained what I believe, you do not agree to that. Now its fair for me to ask what you believe. So explain what you believe that exactly happened, that caused the building to collapse.
NUMBER ONE, I KNEW SOMEONE PERSONALLY THAT WAS ON THE PLANE. I KNOW FOR A FACT THEY ARE DEAD... I HAVE NOT HEARD OR SEEN FROM THEM. YES I AM YELLING. TWO.. take a look at the following image: http://www.airliners.net/open.file/963368/M/ Aside from the obvious engine fire, this is a 767, same type of plane in the video you posted. Look at the "Pod".. See it? See the outline? That "pod" is the bulge in the fuselage, where the landing gear is stored. Look at the bay doors for the landing gear in the image here: This crap is gone way beyond idiotic... People, the mind is a strange thing... You could probably see Jesus in a piece of toast if I put it on ebay... You all are seeing things that just ARE NOT there!!! There is no "pod", no "missile"... No "ghost" plane.. Again, I knew a living breathing, flesh and blood human being that was on that plane, and I can assure you, he died upon impact with a building. I watched it happen, LIVE that day!!!! If ever a thread needed to be closed, this one ranks number one on the list...
Perspective: http://www.iraqbodycount.org/ Better footage of the pod: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbCcb6NV8Io WTC 7 falling into it's own footprint in a controlled demolition: http://youtube.com/watch?v=MwSc7NPn8Ok
What does that have to do with the "pod"? BTW, some things the mainstream will not tell you about.. Libya, lets in weapons inspectors, stops any advancement of WMD's, and decides to stop supporting terror... Today, Korea follows suit.. And will , as Libya, be taken off the terror list... Next, Iran... Seems to me, the war on terror is working. The body count in Iraq has actually gone down if you compare it to that of the Saddam regime... Back on topic... No Pod, No ghost plane, no missile...
I have seen all the videos, the Pentagon did not catch on fire, it would of had to if hit by a full of fuel plane. Show me some plane wreckage in the Pentagon. Just Show me. The hole in Pentagon is alot smaller than if a plan hit it. LOL
It's a useless effort, sammas47. Being part of the best country of the galaxy, makes it difficult to think in a rational way for quite an important portion of the inhabitants. Indeed, patriotism is making them mentally disabled (eyes and mind) to some extend. Even if you could show them a footage that proves it once and for all, they would still argue. Just show them building 7 collapse in a professional way due to a few minor fires inside, then show them Silverstein admitting the job of 'pulling' and they will continue to deny there were bombs inside... Now that they argue is fine, who cares? But after reading this thread, I'm getting the impression that some contributors are members of some kind of aggressive cult, defending their Leaders as if their lives depended on it. This is beyond arguing. You fanatics are using dirty tricks like questions that nobody can answer, verbal violence and insults to someone who isn't speaking in his mother tongue (so am I, so go ahead. I only get these nasty comments from one particular country and no I'm not wearing a towel either). The ultimate goal of the fanatics is to shut our mouths. In a decade or 2, they will defend the chipping of humans. "For our own security". Ha! Poor ignorant slaves of a totalitarian system...
not letting go of threads is another one...which is why threads like these are still around, no matter how wrong we prove they are.
Very good point, I often wonder the same thing myself. Early last year I was permanently banned from ebaumsworld forum because I exposed an FBI mole that was posting in their forum. ebaums is a massive forum too with many peeps online at any one time. There are a couple of people here that defend Bush with such manic fervour that if they are not being paid then they really should be.
ha ha ha ha .... he he he he ... ho ho ha hao aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa............................ whoaaaaw..... ok, I think I can breath again. How did you find this FBI mole and what did your exposing produce? Did it keep the FBI from finding out who took pictures of britney spears? How did you do playing dungeons and dragons or was that pokeyman? <<< now why in the world did I click that View Post button????? >>>
There used to be 9/11 debate on a far greater scale than DP P&R at ebaums mate. They don't just discuss Britney and the slag Hilton. Not sure whether they discuss 9/11 there anymore but they used to do so with a passion.
I won't do it again...... HA! - I didn't click... I am betting you are rambling gibberish or throwing accusations anyways.