DMOZ listing price list

Wow, you went a whole post without mentioning pedophilia, well done.

You are a terribly confused little fellow. There are corrupt editors within the ODP who abuse their privileges to favor their sites. Anyone who said there wasn't would be a fool. It is a constant battle to find them and remove them. Some of the those who post here are removed corrupt editors, often they are ones bitching most loudly how corrupt it all is.

Not only I am not here to defend anything, I have no need to justify anything to you. I have only one site which s not listed in the ODP. That you apply the what would I do if if was in his position is what I would expect of you.

 

Why does this reminds of certain meta who kept checking my edits?

Can you name them specifically or this falls in same category as gworld rantings?

 

Are yer expectin a list, or do ya just want to me leap out behind them screaming removed editor in double high red text evey time they post.

 

First few top posters with EVIDENCE of their crimes is enough.

 

You presumably do accept that from time to time editors are removed for valid reason.

 

My impression is that such cases make small minority of removals, most fall in category "lets make example to other editor what happens to those that dares to stand up to metas or we just want to show to community who is the real boss in DMOZ".

 

From what I can see there is no evidence either way really. people call corruption from all corners of the net with little to no proof. Most of these claims go ignored by DMOZ. DMOZ on the other hand removes editors on a regular basis with little to no evidence given (to even the editor let go).

If people calling corruption are correct SOME of the time, I can only assume that DMOZ is only correct SOME of the time, and without some transparency or proof from either side, there is only speculation.

Speculation leads to paranoia, paranoia leads to further speculation ~ This vicious circle leads to all webmasters "being out to get the ODP" and the "ODP being out to get all webmasters".

It would not be all that hard to end the cycle. Webmasters calling for corruption should be held responsible for the proof of their claims. Though, to make it fair and to not feed the fire, there needs to be some OPENness within the OPEN Directory Project as well. If not, then only half the circle get's closed and there is only a matter of time before the cycle is completed once more.

 

There is little proof about anything when it comes to DMOZ, because of paranoid secrecy it impossible to confirm anything, there hasn't been a single monthly report in a year now so we don't even know how many editors are still left and if they are actually doing anything.

Even most companies are more open then DMOZ since most of them have shareholders to answer to, total lack of accountably of metas and admins to anyone (besides AOL who couldn't care less) has effectively killed community even wikipedia has to keep admins in check and there community can actually remove abusive admin unlike DMOZ where their power is absolute.

 

There is a functioning, public market on buying and selling DMOZ links with reviews from buyers that they have actually got what they paid for. There is a long list of spam and one page affiliate sites with hundreds of links in DMOZ. There is unwillingness from DMOZ side to stop corruption and instead defends and hides it or call it "SEO" work. What kind of proof do you actually need? bank statement from DMOZ editors account?

 

I need a link on ODP

PM me with the details

Nothing is wrong with tipping for good service?

 

Keep advertising your corrupt willingness to list for money.

You say I receive money, then why do I openenly say anyone trying will be reported and anyone named with some evidence will be reported.

I can show you a site that says the earth is still flat, but that don't make it so. Neither does a site saying that people have had sites listed. I could well believe you created the site and wrote the rot yourself.

Why not offer a site through the process and come back and tell us an editor name, see if any action is taken. But in truth you just prefer to smear the directory either because you can't get your spammy, dirty sites listed or because they refused you as an editor or because you got found out for being corrupt and chucked out.

 

LOL. DMOZ corrupts getting more and more desperate. The latest excuse, Scriptlance is my site and I made it to hurt DMOZ.

You must really think that people are stupid, don't you?

 

I wonder if anyone has reported the DMOZ to Google for selling links.

I'm only joking. Google already knows the DMOZ is corrupt but Google owns part of AOL and therefore are part owners of DMOZ.

 

Julian you really are quite a character aren't you, with you being a big shot editall n all who is too scared to reveal any details of the abuse you say you are privy too. You are in a position to throw it all wide open but you don't. Why is that Julian? You can’t be that you are too scared? Or is it anything to do with the teeny porn, escort, and discount pharmacy sites that you promote?

As well as being a coward you are also very gullible. Did you know that not every thing on the internet is true? Yeah really I kid you not. What some people do is pretend to be someone else and post reviews giving 10/10 for their own product. Yes Julian really, who would have figured?

Gworld says he is an editall and I am sure that he would help you out. Apparently he is a real useful guy.

 

LOL. According to neb and anon, not only I own scriptlance and made the site to hurt DMOZ but people will come and post a project, pay for a project and post a review, just to give the "honest" editors of DMOZ a bad name.

You must really think that people believe anything on the Internet in order to really think that anyone will believe the garbage that you are posting. It even gets funnier since you and anon have to hide your DMOZ editor name just because you are so "honest" and don't want people check your edit logs.

 

You really need to concentrate a bit harder Julian. No one is saying that you own sites other than porn, escort sites and discount pharmacies. Not sure why you would think that people are saying you own scriptlance. Did Jim say that you own scriptlance? I can see that your grip on reality going in a downward spiral starting with the big shot editall story, moving on to Jims now this scriptlance business. What next? I can't wait.

 

It was your friend anon that claimed I own scriptlance and then you jumped in and claimed people put a project, bid on it and then post a review, just to give DMOZ "honest" editors a bad name.

I am not surprised that you post these garbage since you are the kind of person who does anything in defense of corruption and for a dollar.

 

This one must be from Gworld, lol...

Though, if it's from an editor, then SHAME on them for entrapment.

 

Post the link, please, I have suggested that anyone could post the garbage on there without any evidence or proof and that you could be posting the reviews saying that one was pleased for a listing to be done after money paid. Anyone can do that. It takes editor names and site names for any proof that those posts are anything but garbage. Anyone can post anything on the internet.

But you are back to editor names and for someone who won't give his/her/it's editall (so claimed) editor name you look a real clown asking for ours. Go back to watching teen porn on your sites. For someone who objects to sections of ODP you don't exactly come out as a shining example. And for the others on here who are on your side and also complain about ODP corruption, they should perhaps look at their alliances very carefully.

 

How about your real name? I prefer to know if I'm talking to real person or yet another troll clone.