Gay couples adopting kids ... NO WAY

Gays don't f**k in front of people neither. Now, If you need to shit, you don't choose. It's natural. As you don't choose your sexual orientation, you're born with it. And you're born as shit maker also...no choice...

 

I don't really know how you imagine anal sex, but it's not a feces party.
You are so disturbed by shit, oh my
Bad past experiences ?

 

No. Gays hold gay parades and have sodomite associations. And gays ask to be treated like everyone else. I can't remember who said he's heterosexual yet he enjoys anal sex. Yet I never heard of a "heterosexual who likes anal sex pride march"

 

its going all offtopic, the discussing is for adopotion of kid not how gays have sex.

 

So a straight guy can replace a woman, but not a gay man? I'd think a gay man acts more like a woman then a straight one!

Also, you're admitting that a child doesn't need a mother figure, if a straight man can replace her...

Really? What about native American's? They were often raised by a tribe as a whole... The term "Normal" is relative; just because it's not normal to you, doesn't make it "not normal" to anyone...

There's stats that can prove anything; but I'd believe those to be incorrect... I've seen plenty of single-parent homes raise awesome children...

See above...

So if a woman isn't able to have a child for a medical reason, she shouldn't be allowed to adopt either? Because she can't "naturally" have a kid...

They're both groups of people denied equal rights...

Even if the majority wouldn't want a "get out of orphanage free" card, I'm sure some would...

 

Why call them gays: isn't sodomites a more appropriate term? And we need to show that if something isn't natural, something even more unnatural like sodomites should not be allowed to adopt kids. We should help the sodomites straighten out not condone their deviant ways. I wonder what kind of morals sodomites can promote to kids.

 

By "natural", do you mean "the majority", or something "caused by nature"?

 

I agree. Sodomites are sodomites and vaginites are vaginites. As vaginite, proteindude hates sodomites. And it's time to eradicate hate on this planet...

 

Oh I am SOOOOO glad you stepped into that, so you're saying being 'gay' is a
'medical' condition.

Medical conditions are treatable last I heard, it is not trully unnatural to treat health problems.

Are you suggesting we start medically treating gays?



Not even a nice try, pretty lame and pathetic. So hard up to try to prove a point, hard without any ammo isn't it?

A health problem is totally different than not being biologically able to have kids even when 100% healthy, totally different story, not even in the same ball park of reality.

 

Just dropping my opinion:

If the two daddies (or mommies) are nurturing to the kid, I would said sure I mean the child will probably experience jokes among children in school for having a different family structure.. (the downfall) but it really does depend on how the person (regardless of sexuality f/m or m/m f/f) raises the child (with love and support )

 

Gay couples shouldn't be allowed to adopt kids. If they want kids, they shouldn't be gay

 

What message is it sending the kid?

 

the whole thing is stupid and backwards, has there been any proof that gays are some how unable to raise children in a healthly environment?

if not there is no reason to not allow them to adopt, a child with gay parents is better off then a ward of the state

 

that all people are equal?

 

Nope i completely disagree with it, if people want to be gay they need to accept they cant have kids.

 

Let's just say you need a man in the family to have a healthy upbringing.

 

What do you mean?

We can't state that all gay parents make horrible unhappy families because not ever family is the same. (I've seen quite a few very happy gay families at Pride last summer ). This can be applied to straight families as well, they're not all happy (quite obvious: with those family abuse problems and such)

 

I was thinking more along the lines that all men are gay...

 

Please re-read my post, I never said that being gay is a medical condition... You said:

I replied with:

Because, by your logic, this woman wouldn't be allowed to adopt, because she can't have a child naturally... Never once did I state that homosexuality was a medical condition...

 

If we don't allow gays to adopt, why do we allow rednecks to? I think they would do more harm then a gay couple... See how relative it is? Why not allow all people equal rights to do so?