What kind of love will they be given??? Do you know the story of the FIRST gay couple to adopt kids in UK. The article starts like this: So politically correct has adoption become, a council allowed these gay paedophiles to foster young boys — even, as one mother reveals here, turning a blind eye when presented with evidence of their horrifying abuse http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=480673&in_page_id=1770 This is the first case of gays being allowed to adopt. I sure as hell wouldn't want this to ever happen again.
well no, i still believe majority of people would not prefer to be gay in future, and here we are discussing adoption you are forcing some one to be a gay, a kid might just want to live a normal guy life, why would he be forced ?
Yea i thought the same. Moreover there are 99% chances of the child(if male) to be forced to become gay by the parents. Shouldn't be allowed.
I believe that the more obsessed with unnatural sex you are, the more likely you are to commit unnatural acts. Gay sex is not natural. Bhhh.... just thinking about it. So if I follow this pattern I am CERTAIN gays would not make good parents but on the OPPOSITE.
BS and just a minority, as you dislike that. The odds to be raped by gay parents are the same than by hetero parents. It has been seen lots of case of adopted kids raped by their heterosexual adoptive parents...
Forced to become gay? And 99% chance, where'd you come up with that statistic? If a parent is a coal-miner, is there a 99% chance the daughter or son will be a coal-miner?
I've jumped out of planes and helicopters, which is VERY unnatural... Does that mean I'm more likely to commit other unnatural acts? Does it mean I would not make a good father?
Good call. I wanted to say that my parents are Miami Dolphins fans, therefore I'll become a Dolphins fan?? coal-miner is another good example... I'm in the 1% BTW...
Of course if it doesn't suit your point you call it BS. In Australia and UK it was the sodomites who wanted to lower the age of consent to 16 from 18. That why if they sleep with a 12 year old they can say: "He looked at least 16." Now, by you saying heterosexuals are just as likely to abuse kids, let me remind you: IT WAS THE SODOMITES THAT LOBBIED FOR A LOWER AGE OF CONSENT. This clearly indicates to me the homosexuals are MORE LIKELY to abuse kids
Well said DevilHellz! I actually find myself agreeing with all your posts in this thread. proteindude's argument seemed to be based around the act of anal sex, it is also worth remembering that many heterosexual partners enjoy some fantastic "back door action." I'm heterosexual and have personally earned my "brown wings" on many occasions. As for an answer to the OP's question, I think it should be allowed. As DevilHellz rightly pointed out the kid will be given love, attention, a home and a family.
Why don't answer my question? If it's not natural, but more like a choice, when did you choose to be heterosexual? At what age?
I've never been to one, but from the stories I've heard, the kids get no privacy, and can't have many of their own possessions... I think it would be interesting for someone to go to an orphanage and take a poll: "How many of you would like to be adopted by a middle-class gay couple?"... PS, 22,000 posts? Jesus!
It is a choice dude. I don't all of a sudden find myself raping a woman because you see I can't help it. I see plenty of attractive women and I am married to one. So if I choose not to have sex with other women (no matter how attractive they look), you can surely choose not to have sex with men. Why is it so important to you at what age I chose to have sex?
^ A great example of ignorant people. Educate yourselves. The kids don't automatically turn gay because of their parents. Read this article.
I'm not asking at what age you've got sex...I'm asking at what age you choose to be heterosexual instead of homosexual?
Ok, so -some- would want to be adopted by the gay couple... So why should we not allow it, if some of the kids would want it?