Trying to provoke Iran: US plans military base near Iran

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by ablaye, Sep 10, 2007.

  1. #1
    US plans military base near Iran

    The Pentagon plans to build a military base near the Iran-Iraq border, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    The newspaper quoted a senior US army commander as saying that the base will be used to try to prevent the flow of weapons by Shia fighters into Iraq.

    Major-General Rick Lynch, the commander of the US army's 3rd Infantry Division, said that the Pentagon also plans to build checkpoints on major highways leading from the Iranian border to the Iraqi capital, Baghdad.

    X-ray machines will be installed, as well as explosive-detecting sensors, the paper reported.

    Lynch also told the newspaper: "We've got a major problem with Iranian munitions streaming into Iraq. This Iranian interference is troubling and we have to stop it."

    The base will be about four miles from the Iranian border and will be used for at least two years.

    'Cutting-off supplies'

    US officials told the paper that it is unclear whether it will be among the small number of facilities that would remain in Iraq after any future withdrawal by the US military.

    The report comes on the same day as General David Petraeus, the highest-ranking US commander in Iraq and Ryan Crocker, the US ambassador to Iraq, present a report to the US congress on the war.

    Jonathan Withington, a Pentagon spokesman, told Reuters news agency that he could not comment on the specifics of the planned base, but said that "coalition and Iraqi partners will continue to put pressure on the enemy, including disruptions of any supply lines, in an effort to reduce violence and to protect the Iraqi people".

    Major Toby Logsdon, a US officer overseeing the project, said the new base will have living quarters for at least 200 soldiers, who could arrive in November.

    Logsdon said: "Iran will know this is here - they will have to rethink how they do things, and the smugglers will have to rethink how they do things."

    US officials accuse Iran of fomenting violence to destabilise Iraq and of seeking to build nuclear weapons under the cover of a civilian nuclear programme, charges Iran has denied.

    Source: http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/BC6747CC-8401-4151-9E94-749E6FC0D147.htm
     
    ablaye, Sep 10, 2007 IP
  2. zangief

    zangief Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,722
    Likes Received:
    55
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #2
    God Save Iran people if American economy goes worse , this is capitalizm everytime economy goes bad there is war in the history.
    Iraq was a small bite they have eaten it now they need a bigger bite Iran , It is not about religion , not about mass destruction weapons (America has the strongest mass destruction weapon if it was the point the whole world would stand against them.) It is not about terorism , America supports Pkk and Pjak terorist groups in Iraq.

    There is no profit in peace boys , so we've gotta fight some more.
    And when there is war only the poor people die.
     
    zangief, Sep 11, 2007 IP
  3. bfebrian

    bfebrian Peon

    Messages:
    1,246
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    i think the US have population problem, that why they so eager for another war.
    sent more young soldier to die...
    I still remember the hobard's family... they loose 2 of their son's.
     
    bfebrian, Sep 11, 2007 IP
  4. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    That's good news, Iran needs to be controlled.
     
    Toopac, Sep 11, 2007 IP
  5. CountryBoy

    CountryBoy Prominent Member

    Messages:
    8,970
    Likes Received:
    754
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #5
    I suppose it's preferable to nuking Iran (which is what I would do).

     
    CountryBoy, Sep 11, 2007 IP
  6. ablaye

    ablaye Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,024
    Likes Received:
    97
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #6
    What the difference between you and a terrorist???
    I guess you would find it acceptable if someone would choose to nuke the US.
     
    ablaye, Sep 11, 2007 IP
  7. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #7
    The power of the copy/paste skill is strong in this one.
     
    lorien1973, Sep 11, 2007 IP
  8. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #8
    I love how liberals like to try and twist things to fit their agenda.....

    From the title of this thread:
    and then from the actual article:
    Not one place in the article said anything about "provoking"...:rolleyes:
     
    d16man, Sep 11, 2007 IP
  9. DharmaSeo

    DharmaSeo Peon

    Messages:
    1,819
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    but the real problem was how iran provoked US and the democratic world

    US is just responding the same way they always respond and THE WAY IRAN EXPECTED them to RESPOND
     
    DharmaSeo, Sep 11, 2007 IP