September 11, 2001 attacks were planned by the United States government

LMAO! It's always the ones that didn't get enough attention from their parents. alex jones fills this void and gives them meaning in life!

 

That's a pretty big fuck up isn't it, Tesla? For a plan that went so perfectly (fooled almost everyone!) - that's a pretty basic isssue, don't you think?

Plane for WTc1
Plane for wtc2
plane for pentagon
flight 93 (not sure where it was going)
blow up wtc7 with demolitions

What moron does that, seriously? You pretend to be a logical person. Try to make sense of that will ya?

Again. Please take a second to look at the specs of the building. It's not too difficult to grasp once you see this.

Building. not. pushed. from. side.

The hulk was not on scene

 

So, you've never done it, means its not done. Well, hell, I'm a truther now! Are you that narcissistic?

 

Landing speed, full speed, does it really make a difference? Why would engineers design a building to withstand impact only at landing speed, and not take full speed into consideration? This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life.

 

I've never seen a million dollars, but I know "it" exists.

 

Rittmeister
Peon Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2

---------

I think we have a conspiracy going on right here in DP's P&R forums. Who do you guys think it is?

 

Sure does! Its only a major speed differential. Not to mention fuel onboard etc

You've read a physics book, Tesla. Never got to the chapter on momentum, did we?

It was assumed the only way a plane would hit the tower would be landing, in fog, and get lost landing at either JFK or newark. Similar to the plane that hit the empire state building in 45.

 

Lorien, you know that "it" refers to one thing. I will post the definition for you here from the dictionary:

It: used to represent an inanimate thing understood, previously mentioned, about to be mentioned, or present in the immediate context): It has whitewall tires and red upholstery. You can't tell a book by its cover.

This definition from the dictionary clearly shows that "it" means a thing, an inanimate object, not a group of humans. Pay close attention to the definition above, especially the part where it says "used to represent an inanimate thing understood, previously mentioned, about to be mentioned, or present in the immediate context."

In the video, Larry Silverstein did not mention the team of firefighters immediately before he used the term "pull it" so it is impossible for me to believe that he was referring to the group of firefighters. The only way Larry Silverstein could be right is if it was established earlier in the conversation that "it" meant the firefighters. This was never established.

 

Reduced to dictionaries and refusing to understand the conversation in context; at the time it happened. Tesla. Please.

NFL is a group of football teams
It has a great marketing team.

Microsoft employs a lot of dorks.
It has the control of the OS market.

Need help?

Expand your vocabulary, just a little. It as a group is quite common.

 

No doubt. They've been waiting, like a pack of wolves. Who is "it?" Good question

Kids whose parents didn't provide them proper home training and those that are looking to give aid and comfort to terrorists by attempting to absolve them of their crimes.

 

Someone's knocking at the door.

Gee, I wonder who "it" is?

Well, what do you know, "it's" another one of those dumb ass alex jones troofers!

 

Hey lorien, you said that "Pull" doesn't mean to bring down a building right? Well, check out one of the definitions of "pull" from dictionary.com:

Pull Down b. to demolish; wreck.

Hmmm. I wonder what that is referring to?

 

The noob went home crying fast, didnt he? LOL

9/11 threads are really sadistic. I feel like I carve up people each time

 

I'm really sick of this 9/11 shit.
I'm also really fucking sick that I used to hire telsa to write articles for me.

 

dictionaries again? context is irrelevant once again. Pull it. Pull the team. Why is it difficult for you?

demolition people do not use it to take down a building. this is the point, tesla. Come on. Can you try harder for me?

 

This does not make any sense, has the government not heard of shreaders or incinerators, why risk blowing their plan by blowing WTC7 which would not destroy any evidence anyways, just cover it up with ruble or send it flying through the air for anyone to find.

 

Same here. Rule #1 on the forum. Never do business with dishonest people. If their discussion is dishonest, you can bet their business practices are too.

 

I'm not done yet, I'm just getting started........just pulling together my sources.

For the rest of this thread, I will focus just on the Larry Silverstein clip from PBS, which is right here for all DP members of view on YouTube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

Now, I will write here exactly what Larry Silverstein says in the video, after the part about the "pull it":

"maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it, uhhh and they made that decision, to pull, eh, that we watch the building collapse"

Alright, above is the EXACT statement made by Larry Silverstein, and anyone who doesn't believe me can click on the YouTube link to listen for themselves. Now, lets explore this statement like a good detective.

In the statement, Larry Silverstein never mentions the firefighters. First he says pull it, then he references WTC building 7. Now, anyone who passed English or grammar school knows that when you use the word "it" and then refer to something immediately after it, this is what you're talking about.

You see, if Gtech did it. You see, Gtech has passed his English classes like me. He said "someone" first, which established a person, then he used "it" which tells me he is referring to "someone at the door."

Larry Silverstein did the same thing, but he was referring to the building.

 

I didn't know he thought like this. He wrote for me a while back.

 

Attacking me personally instead of attacking my views, eh Gtech. Umm, check my itrader points pal. I got well over 113 positives. Wow, I must scam a lot of people to get all those positive itrader points.

You should be ashamed of yourself. Business and personal believes should be kept separate. Now back to Larry Silverstein and his comments. Lorien, can you look at the video, and read the comment he made and tell me he was referring to a team of firefighters. It is very obvious that he wasn't. He never mentions firefighters at all. He says "uhhh and they made that decision, to pull, eh, that we watch the building collapse"


Now, here is the $64,000 question. Who is "they?" Who made the decision for us to watch the building collapse?