By putting angry nutty liberals on their show all the time? That's not very pleasing to me. Fox would be a whole lot better if they got rid of all the whiney liberals they invite on for counter opinions all the time. Or is it conservatives they invite on to counter the liberal opinion?
Of course you dont like counter opinions to the conservative opinions. You are an extremist conservative and that kind of people only like their own voice.
So we can agree that your initial post about Fox was incorrect? Fox is inundated with liberal commentary, day in and day out. That was the point I was actually trying to make. I just had to word it with a bit of outrage to solicit your response.
You are trying to put words in my mouth. Forget it. FOX is an ultra conservative channel. You dont think that FOX its ultra conservative of course because you are an extremist. If you was a muslim you would be a suicide bomber.
Are you referring to "Fox News", or the countless Fox affiliates? Whenever I tune in, there's always a panel including 1 (maybe 2) centrists or leftists... And they never get ample time to respond, or are constantly spoken over... Whether it's Fox, CNN, or MSNBC, I've never seen an honest, logical, no-spin, debate... In the words of Jon Stuart: "It's partisan hackery"...
While that may or may not be true, it's something that all of the extremists here should take heed of. While it's understandable to feel patriotism, especially in a time of war, I fail to see what separates one from the other? If an Iraqi were to post and say "the US is terrible, etc" you guys would freak out, but you freely distribute the exact same extreme opinions that you claim to hate so much. Moderation is always important, and it's the key to debate.
The best thing is when FOX bring on someone for a debate (i.e OH NO Reilly, O'Malkin and that other bird, can't remember her name) and they have a debate where they all agree with each other. It's laughable. FOCKS is very pro Republican, whether it will change to pro Democrat when Hillary gets in remains to be seen. Knowing Rupert Murdoch and how he switches allegiance at the drop of a hat I would say expect FOCKS to switch over around the middle of 2k8.
Well hes right for once. But when joined Halliburton in 1995. He felt the comfortable money through politics, i guess thats when he start to play dirty politics.
no, I think the majority of people would disagree....but then again, liberals will context anything in order to get it to fit their agenda....just like trying to blame Bush for price gouging at the pumps, blaming him for Katrina, global warming, etc....Much can be said the same about liberals and FoxNews...when you can't take the heat, what do you do? You get out of the kitchen....To claim that only FoxNews is biased is in itself a biased statement.
And you think the American people would disagree about cheney's 1994 remarks resembling the current state of Iraq? Are you incorrectly accusing people of altering definitions again? You seem to do that every time you can't think of a real argument...