Now if we go with your thinking, Its very much possible to control the planes with an RC. but that would need a heavy modification in any commercial airliner. The plane they make for crash landing are specially built planes for that purpose. Now if they used RC to control the plane, that would need an excellent plan to carry out this so much successfully. Now the loopholes in the plan. 1. What happened to the passengers of the planes? 2. what happened to the crew members of the plane? 3. If all the passengers and crew members were on board, what were the pilots doing? didn't the passengers notice that pilots were not flying the plane? 4. Who did all the modifications to make the plane able to controlled by RC? 5. Who was controlling the plane and from where? 6. A plan as large as this one, needs several hundred people to execute it successfully. would the administration as genius as this much take the risk of involving 100s of people in a plan like this? When the risk of anyone revealing the plan to the world anytime is so high? 7. What is the benefit of making such plans in long term for administration? 8. Why anyone is not able to get even a single credible proof of administration making such plans? Definitely there are many people who can give an arm and a leg to reveal the evil deeds of this evil administration? Why all we see are mere theories and not facts?
hey, if Mythbusters can do life size remote control cars...the surely the US govt can do life size airplanes....
Has anyone found a link for it anywhere? As I said before our UK History Channel is often way behind it's US counterpart. I'm hearing that they didn't cover Building 7, can anyone confirm or deny that?
That's nice of you PC Rambo. I'm after a link for it so I can go and watch it, this must be one of the only times that I wish I was in the USA as I believe it's airing again tonight.
There is no link for this program in you tube.. give it few days, may be someone will upload it somewhere..
I thought so...I will look for you as well...but if I find it, I am sure you will ignore it...if you find it and watch it, I'm sure you will claim you never saw it. That way it can't "prove" you wrong.
Of course I'll watch it, why do you think I am asking peeps if they know where a link is. Jesus mate get with the program!!! I think The Webmaster is right, someone has yet to get it uploaded to Google Video, unless it is broken down into parts I don't think it can be uploaded onto YouTube (don't they have a 10 minute max limit?)
Nothing was shown that you haven't already chosen to dismiss here a hundred times AGS, so don't fret. Life is still peaceful at the pool of ignorance. Here's Alex Jones showing his vast knowledge of Galileo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzJOGNevg_U The best lady was the one whose argument that 9/11 was a conspiracy was essentially: because you can't say "clunkety-clunk" 110 times in the time it took the towers to fall; that proves demolitions were used. Eh?
That is certainly not what I'm hearing GTech, I'm still hoping someone is going to upload it to Google Vid.
There are lots of rumours including, the attack was done by the US and another rumour was that the attack was done by Jews as there was no Jews working that day. Rumours, Rumours and more Rumours. Everyone has a different story.
Considering where you hang out and the type of people you associate with, I have no doubt you are hearing the other side. I don't let people like that do my thinking for me, so I'm immune to it. P.S. Why not just blame it on the Jews?
That would be the easy way out GTech, I am reserving my opinion on this, I need to see it. Lorien has already told me it's the same kind of BS as the last hit piece but I would like to see it myself, I'm looking forward to hearing all the experts from Popular Mechanics opinions.
Yes, alex jones did label it a "hit piece" before it even aired. So I can see where you would get that from. Popular Mechanics presented numerous experts and witnesses that were dishonestly used by "troofers" in the past. It really put the light on how dishonest these "troofers" are. Of course, if facts don't matter (and apparently they do not), then as Lorien has suggested...it will simply be dismissed. I have no illusion that you will see reality.
I hear they are using experts like James Meigs mate. But ignoring real experts like Steven E. Jones. I hear that William Rodriguez was ignored too, I smell a rat here GTech but I'll pass judgement after seeing it.
Here is some real journalism. Not the one sided hit piece. Davin Coburn gets owned when he is not protected by hearst. Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLx5GATh_z0 Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pb49MfDrwOo follow up: http://www.youtube.com/v/t0uVwS544Rg
That's what you get for listening to "troofers." Steven Jones was in the video. You smell a rat because you are told to. Remember, facts don't matter. Only the message matters. If facts can't persuade you, do you really think I believe anything else would sway you? We both know it's not about the truth for you.