Operation Chickenhawk: The Cowardly, Hypocritical College Republicans

It's a great domain name mate.

And as Americas fake mayor will get the Repub shout you need to start developing it A.S.A.F.P

The scumbag will not get President (that's Hillary's) but he'll get the call for the Repubs.

Ron Paul is far too honest and cares too much for the American people so he ain't got a hope in hell, the other candidates are utter buffoons so Rudy is IN THE HOLE.

Go get 'em tiger!

 

That is because they don't care what is real or the truth, they just want to be a loud mouth so they can pretend that they are a man.

 

We need some laugh around here, so this is a plea to all the loud mouth in cheer leaders squad like Gtech, d16boy, Mia, debunk, Lorien and little willy to post their "medical" excuses for not participating in this war that they so strongly support so we can have a good laugh.

Come on, be nice and make us laugh with your excuses.

 

That's a good question. There do seem to be a lot of avid war supporters here, that are probably prime age for enlisting... I would kind of also like to know, not to be degrading, but seriously, if a person is so pro-war, and really believes that the death toll is worth it, why not enlist?

 

It's almost unbelievable how stupid these college republicans are. Mind numbingly so.

Fantastic video.

 

They say it's because it's a volunteer military. Any normal person's suspicion would be that they don't think it's worth their life or health to liberate, disarm, or whatever the excuse du jour is for being in Iraq.

 

I like the grand chickenhawk, Romney Doolittle. He talks tough about Americans in harms way but when asked about his own kids, they are doing their part for America by helping their dad get elected.

A volunteer military favors the elite.

 

Yes it does...

As for the Romney comment... Jeez, I hope he's embarrassed for saying that...

 

It seems that they don't like to answer a simple question.

 

I wonder if they ever really stop to think about what they are saying or if they simply parrot the opinions that were given to them. It is sad really.

 

That's actually a study I'm doing... I'm compiling data on how many people blindly follow the party of their parents! they usually do

 

I'm always amazed at the liberals who would have others serve their country for them, then point out how others will not serve their country for them.

 

And I am equally amazed at the neo-cons who talk tough and shelter their own children.

That is why Ron Paul is our man. He wants EVERY American out of harms way in the ME. Even if it costs us more for oil, even if it means we might have the national guard to deal with domestic crisis and even if it means having money to support the welfare state without devaluing the dollar further.

Ron Paul. 2008.

 

What about progressive or centrist serves his country in a conflict, then argues against the conflict to a bunch of republicans that have not served in the same conflict? That's what amazes me...

 

I just wanted to post in this thread to say that I get a chuckle every time I read the title

 

Depends on how truthful the supposed "progressive" is. Jesse MacBeth and Scott Beauchamp comes to mind. John Kerry is the role model for these types. There have been a few others too. You'd be surprised at how *some* believe blind hatred of someone justifies dishonesty about them. I've never understood that myself, but I suppose the hated is so overwhelming, that they don't care about facts.

 

That is very funny coming from you and I am still waiting to hear you and your gang excuses for why you are such a sissy and don't participate in a war that you supposedly support.

 

Hmmm... How about WebDevHowTo and myself; both served in the current Iraq conflict, but are pro-troop/anti-war? The two of us have made plenty of posts about this topic, and have taken flak from right wingers that have not served in the conflict...

That's complete craziness if you ask me... I would never so staunchly support a war, yet be unwilling to fight in it...

 

How about you guys?

1) Do you believe your posts here, border more on the line of pro-America or anti-America? (I'm considering your fairly new post that I thought was just way off base, but also taking into account that when you search posts made by WDHT in this forum, they certainly don't seem to be "America" friendly.)


2) You say you are pro-Troop. Fair enough. Do you want your fellow brothers and sisters in Iraq to succeed, or be defeated? Set aside your own desires for a moment and think about others. Is that what you want?

3) Do you believe dishonesty is an appropriate tool to further a cause? For example, *some* wmd were found in Iraq. And *someone* agreed, at one time, that *some* were found. Then later went on a denial streak to avoid every shred of evidence supporting such. In cases like that, is dishonesty justified in one's cause?

4) Do you believe most soldiers want to be defeated? Or would they prefer to come home from Iraq in some sort of fashion that reflects the positive things they have done?

5) When you see blatant anti-Americans on this very forum, some of whom have openly admitted to supporting terrorists and never have a good word about America, do you ignore these things because they are anti-war also, or do you choose to comment on those who oppose these people, because you both have one thing in common...anti-war?

6) Do you believe you are supporting/representing troops today, or a personal agenda?

I agree. I support our troops over there. While you were supposedly in Iraq, defending our country, I was defending you from hateful anti-Americans like gworld and others that slandered your service in Iraq.

 

Here by, Gtech the queen of cheer leaders squad is awarded the purple heart of cheer leading for his brave fight against the enemy and never leaving his keyboard while hiding under his bed.

Give it up, you are a coward and everyone can see it.