Google's 2007-Q3/Q4 PageRank (PR) Update

I don't know if this is significant, but this tool: http://www.iwebtool.com/pagerank_prediction is showing no backlinks for any sites at the moment, apart from www.google.com - which it predicts will the PR 9.

 

Have u noticed statcounter went down to 9PR with millions of backlinks all over the net

That means we should be prepared for the worse from Google

 

Still you self this qestion, will i use this searchengine if i have to search many times to find what im loocking fore?? I bellive the answerd to this is no.....for almost all.

So what can we do to make peopple find what they are realy looking for......and how can we rank the sites best for the users, this is the main qestion for the searchengines.

Here is the key im talking about, and the sites gets "wotes" for YES, find it, or NO, dident find it "back/X".


So i belive the PR is a very, very small counting factor, users is desiding what they want to rank first. If you playing by the roule with words will seachengines rank you hight, but from her is the users taking over and deside what and if they found that they are looking for.


Sorry again for my bad english, but i hope you understand

 

Well that's just super you want to share your opinions on Google page rank, but this thread is actually about the latest page rank update - not an existential hypothesis on the significance of PR.

 

One of my sites has gone from a PR4 to a PR3. This thing is really close. I wish google woul hurry up lol

 

Ok so how does Google know if you like it or not? How does Google know if you closed the window or not?

 

They Collect statistics from Adsense + Google toolbar.

Adsense:

they collect every piece of information they could about the user behavior, (to prevent fraud of course but also for other purposes)

Google Toolbar:

Google:

 

Maybe they log all hits and use the info for ranking?

 

I didn't know the insect pet market was that lucrative.

I'll have to swap my bug bombs for collection boxes.

 

At this time, I see a difference here at #8 on these two datacenters:
http://209.85.135.18/search?q=link:http://www.google.com/webhp
http://72.14.207.100/search?q=link:http://www.google.com/webhp
They used different snapshot dates or different data sets to produce the backlinks.
In this case, I see the smallwarsjournal.com was added to the first ten backlinks.

This seems to be a canonicalization update, the only pages seeing changes in PR are those that had problems - googlebot got off track. But everyone got backlinks, and different ones on different datacenters if they are big enough.

The universal backlink update seems to be necessary to release even the limited PR changes we see in testing a correction to the index.

In addition to different snapshot dates or times causing a difference in backlinks, some may show up due to the page the backlink is on having been corrected and re-added to the index - and the data set - with its proper address.

 

Boy its getting deep in here now

 

I am sure you have sold links ...to your grandma
or is there a market where PR2 is the highest you can get?

 

Are we there yet????

 

Yes it has crossed my mind.
I think that this is why some new sites that have oryginal content, do not drop after the FSB is over. Sites that keep visitors are high in SERPs despite the little or no BL and low/no PR.
I have experienced this first hand.
Sites that do not have a good cotent ( build just for adsense) stay o top only because MASSIVE and steady number of BL.

 

this is why we're having a delay.
http://www.ontopresults.com/blog/2007/08/13/google-pagerank-to-be-changed-to-google-webrank/

 

So simple = THE PR UPDATE HASN'T HAPPENED YET !!

 

LOL, that is brilliant! I'd love it to be true

I can just see it now:

"Site for sale, 300 uniques a month, Google webrank (WR) of 9! 2 months old! Get it while it's hot!"

 

ok im thinking i got half this but you lost me at ...

I have a portal in Norway (PR 3) and i was making a new underside in the katalog (14 days) ago and its alredy on page 4 to google! Yahoo haven't indexed this side yet, but i have better rank to them at the same word/words on another sites.

Can you clarify better or someone who did undrstand

thx
malcolm

 

you bet

 

Yes, that's me standing by Alaska's Kenai River in July, 2006. I caught that 62-pound king (chinook) salmon in the river that morning. Now consider this for ROI (Return On Investment) — filleted out, about 30 pounds of king salmon, at $15/pound retail for fillets, makes that a $450 fish. (I did not sell it.)