I understand that since you are such a "straight" guy, you don't like to talk about *** and instead prefer to pray to stay "straight".
I love talking about sex, but I do it with my wife...not while dreaming about gtech's ball's (which is what you are known for)...
yes, and talking produced the kid that is due the beginning of Oct....it was a miracle, God did it. And that would be the Jewish God, so I bet you hate him too, added to the list of USA, Bush, Gtech, the rest of us, and of course, DMOZ.
yes, he is...he always talks about little willy's, gtech's balls, little boys, etc. However, when you point it out, he tries to turn the tide...hence the reason he is using the word "Straight" when replying to my posts...he probably thinks it makes me mad or something...
I'm starting to think the P&R forums is less about intelligent discussion on issues, and more about having fun bashing people with differing opinions... In which case, d16man, you have a stupid username, and your sig links are stupid colors... haha, kidding... that reminded me of 3rd grade though... good times...
You're starting to think that? Not a quick study, are you? And just so you know...I'm just joking. Otherwise I'd call you TamponKeith...haha
glad to know that your username is not stupid.... what color scheme are you using for DP? The colors might look different...also, I did not choose the colors, the people that buy my sig links do.
Haha, you wouldn't believe how many times I've heard that, but I've been using this username for about a decade, too late to change it now...
You know about the stories that it was a Roman soldier and Mary was smart enough to blame it on God, don't you?
so are you saying a roman soldier impregnated my wife??? you are really a total idiot, do you know that??
No, i think he gave this as an example, saying that someone else had sex with your wife. Very insightful discussion, i might add!
LMAO! That was hilarious! Not only that, but a while back, he actually admitted he had to pay for sex! Gee, I can't imagine why
As it regards #2 I still don't see how the question about global warming became an issue of conservative versus democrat or liberal versus conservative. Theoretically a conservative would be against extensive government regulations and I could see having problems w/ rules from epa, etc. IMHO this administration takes a look at an issue, see how its partisan supporters, or financial backers would treat it....and then creates a spin on it. In fact it appears this administration has battled science coming out of its own offices: the surgeon general was muzzled, NASA and NOAA scientists were muzzled, Fish and Wildlife scientists were muzzled. In many ways coming up with alternative fuel sources and developing ways to counter man made heat sources create tremendous opportunities for new businesses, new work and new economic endeavors. I don't see how question #2 became a politically charged issue.
earlpearl, are you aware of the massive amount of scientists and weather experts that counter this theory? It's not just one sided. http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/aug2007/2007-08-06-02.asp I simply cannot understand the blind hatred and how some allow it to say some of the most absurd things. As for how it's politically charged, that one is simple. Liberals are dynamically self loathers. They love placing blame for something on their country. That's a given. We all know this. No big secret there. Conseratives take more of a position of "let's see the evidence." Not unlike myself, here in the forum. I don't participate much in the Google section about PR updates and ranking techniques. Why? Because it's all speculation. It's all opinion. I don't argue opinion very well. But I can argue well when I have references and facts on my side. For every person that says "but, but, but scientists have said it's all our fault" there are as many, if not more, that say "whoa, hold on a sec, this is not true and here is why." I have a bookmark folder full of such references I've been saving over the past year, with this very topic. One side says it exists, the other side says it doesn't. Meanwhile, al gore may very well be the single most largest individual contributor to the supposed "global warming." I find this hypocrisy very disturbing. Do as I say, not as I do.
oh god does it hurt your head to be so wrong all of the time most of scientists who deny global warming, and it is a small percentage, are funded by oil companies http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20122975/site/newsweek that is total bullshit and you know it, more like there is a scientist that says one thing and then there is some fringe conservative websites of dubious origins saying its not true and then not saying why lol, fact and references from far right blogs, like your WMD references where you believe blogs over the president, what a joke you have become.