I have been seeing a lot of people lately posting when they get ranked close to the top for certain key terms. Now I'm not saying its a bad thing to be on the first page but honestly is it really helping as far as submissions is concerned? Don't most people who want to submit come to forums like this one to seek out new places to submit to? And how hard is it to get on the first page? I don't now, or ever will consider myself an SEO expert in any way but just for illustration I managed to get myself on the first page for a couple key terms. I just don't think its very hard anymore if a person has a few bucks, the will, and some time... Am I wrong? ps: If you are going to red rep me for my opinion, please have the courtesy to sign it
Us webmasters find directories thru forums like DP. SEO and marketing companies working on behalf of other companies will probably search google for niche and general terms...
Being on the first page in google results for a competitive keyword, that many users look for, then you will receive huge amounts of traffic. Conversion of this traffic is something everyone has to work on. It may be easy to climb to the first page for many keywords, but they probably won't bring you any traffic. Try keyword "web directory" and see what happens. You still think it's easy for someone to be on the first page for this term?
The key is to get very popular keywords that will attract traffic with the potential to convert to submissions And then comes the hard bit finding those keywords that are not saturated with every one trying to get some meat To chew off the same bone
To me it is, I am much more likely to give a directory that is ranking well for a competitive keyword my business than one that is not. It shows me the the owner is putting a lot into marketing and promotion. For example just check out the phrase "web directory" you won't make it there unless you are busting your ass.
I track my statistics closely. There is no doubt that first-page search results bring you more traffic. In fact, don't ever be content with #9 or #10 on the first page. Almost every surfer starts by glancing at the #1 link and description on the results page, then #2, #3, etc. I don't have the data at hand, but I recall seeing statistics that show many more clicks for the first few listings on page 1 than for the later listings on page 1. Keep optimizing your pages that are now on Google's first page to get them higher on the first page. Never be content with being, say, #8. Go for higher! The traffic will increase.
hello... I ran a thread not long ago asking... What are your prefrences "set at" for google search 1. 10 results 2. 20 results 3. 30 results 4. 50 results 5. 100 results The majority said 10 and some didnt even know it was possible to chnage the number of results... Conclusion... Its Crucial to be in the top 10 as thats where you traffic will come from in those terms as not many are willing to travel into pages 2-3... thx malcolm
Malcolm, that's a great point. I set my Google preferences to give me 100 results. But your data make a compelling point — the majority of surfers do not look beyond Google's first page. I hadn't thought of the "preferences" angle. Nice catch.
mostly will just look the first page, but wiser google users will looks deeper to find what they are looking for. it all depends in what you are promoting, if it some specialized product or affiliate merchandise maybe 2-4 page is better.
One research says that most people don't check page 3. So, whatever the keyword you SEO for your website, if not in top 20, it's almost useless... unless your keyword is very competitive. Furthermore, top 10 rankings are the hot spots. The data below is old, from AOL CTR results in top 10 ranks. Total Searches:9,038,794 Total Clicks: 4,926,623 Click Rank1: 2,075,765 Click Rank2: 586,100 = 3.5x less Click Rank3: 418,643 = 4.9x less Click Rank4: 298,532 = 6.9x less Click Rank5: 242,169 = 8.5x less Click Rank6: 199,541 = 10.4x less Click Rank7: 168,080 = 12.3x less Click Rank8: 148,489 = 14.0x less Click Rank9: 140,356 = 14.8x less Click Rank10: 147,551 = 14.1x less Notice the gap between #1 and #2 is the biggest.
Great numbers. Thanks for posting them. That pretty much makes the case for working to get higher and higher on Google's page 1.
Very interesting comments indeed... I guess the push is on to get to the top for more and better key terms Thanks for the push
Very huge difference for sure. Once my photoblog directory became the first for photoblog directory and photo blog directory terms and the traffic jumped from 200 daily uniques to 500 daily uniques.
I will look beyond the first page if i need to find something really important that i cant find on the first page. - Prilep
I've noticed my habit is to scroll down the search results so I'm looking at 1-9 or 1-10. I quickly scan the titles and relevant text underneath, and then click on the one that looks the most useful/least spamiest. This is done very subconsciously, I have to stop myself in the middle of doing it to even take notice of what I'm doing. I would imagine at least a few web users out there have brains that function similar to mine. At the screen resolution I use, I can usually see all 10 results at once. For other screen resolutions this might not be possible. Also, if the search results include a couple sponsored ads at the top, that might prevent some people from seeing the bottom two results (9 and 10). I've developed a bit of blindness to the sponsored ads, so that's not a problem. What I'm getting at is this: the number one search result is obviously great, but numbers 2-8 are often nearly as good. 9 & 10 are a little worse, and anything past page 1 is going to have significantly less traffic than the top results.
I have experienced the similar. Being #3 and being #1 is a big difference even though it looks only few inches away Many people assume or think (I was one of them also ) there isn't much difference among the top 3. Visually, they really look pretty much the same. You think if searchers click on #1, they would click on #2 or #3 likewise, but the statistics shows differently. I used to think #3 spot was the best because it's close to the center of the screen Other important factors: Keyword in title Well written description If your title and description are better than your competitors, they will more likely visit yours
It is always important to rank high in search engines. We will, if the submission is reasonably priced always try to submit to a directory that ranks well in a search engine as it goes along way to show a good possibility your link will be found.
Some keywords are useless, but if you are talking about a niche or a competitive keyword like "Business Directory" "Web Directory" "Blog Directory", it sure helps These keywords have sales potential and any visit can lead to a sale, so it helps to be ranking for these terms.. The others, biggest, great...etc are useless p.s. However, i plan to launch the most useless anchor text campaign myself E.g. Sutra Dude Yes, even a single visit may lead to a sale Not necessary, i got a few submisionn in one of my directory even before i formally launched it. Depends on the competive nature of the keywords Off lately most web directory owners are after the top spots for the KW "Web Directory", so its going to be sweet to rank hign for it It would only matter if those keywords bring in any traffic.. No body is wrong or right, every one has their way of considering or formulating an approach, which they can call their own.. And trust me, not all secrets are shared like i will not ever share the NICHE KW that bring me traffic, the generic ones (web directory) are not a scare (and thats the truth for most people in SEO)