How to Foster Anti-War Sentiment among Americans

Queen of cheer leaders is mad again.

Gtech, what word do you prefer for people to call you and the other cheer leaders in your squad, Sissy or Pus*y?

Keep on clowning and thanks for making me laugh all the time. Still laughing at you.

 

Is this how you respond to GTech's post about you?? Instead of denying that you are anti-american, you skirt the issue, and talk about cheerleaders? Is this your new fad for the week?
http://www.google.com/search?q=site...rld+cheerleaders&hl=en&start=10&sa=N&filter=0

 

Why should I care about what queen of cheerleader squad thinks?

I can understand that as one of his cheerleaders, your queen opinion is important to you but the rest of the world just sees you as a bunch of loud mouth sissy and can care less about what you think.

 

rest of the world, or just you and AGS?

Why don't you respond, instead of this stupid cheerleader stuff (really, it is stupid, just ask AGS...)?

 

Don't disrespect Gstring as he's 50 years old you just wouldn't know it

 

Most of the world can see that you are just another loud mouth sissy.

 

Actually my rep points would indicate otherwise people see you as a disgruntled teen even if you are 50

 

Seriously. Everyone has asked nicely. You can admit to being anti-American. A leopard can't change his spots and neither can you.

 

I predict he will answer...by talking about little boys, ball's, male cheerleaders or some other male body part that he has a fascination with...Does anyone else see a trend here?

 

If anti-American means supporting democracy and fighting for peace then you are right. I suppose for you being pro-American means to claim that U.S. Constitution is just a piece if paper and every one should cheer for war.

 

sorry for off-topic post
first time seen a person banned when he has got like 22K+ posts with all the greenbullbs shining...what could possibly went wrong..i wonder

 

When you say "supporting democracy and fighting for peace" for who?

Your posts previously in this forum indicate it's for terrorists?

Your not just anti-war though are you? those nice people in gitmo you want released are not being bombed are they? Do you simply support the opposing side in a misguided type of way because your anti-war?

 

for every one.

Your posts previously and presently indicate that you have no brain.

Nobody should be denied the right to be charged, have a defense lawyer and judged by a court of law, no matter what they are supposedly guilty of. I support the rule of law but I suppose this is too complicated of a subject for someone with your limited mental capacity.

 

Oh right. It's just i've never heard anything from you in regard to prisoners held in Iran for example, under the same circumstances you describe above, do these cases not bother someone who is "supporting democracy and fighting for peace"? why do only get concerned about "supporting democracy and fighting for peace" when it's related to terrorists. This does make some people think twice about your claims wouldn't you say?

Maybe your not a terrorist rights activist though, i do admit i could be mistaken. Maybe you like to just point out the wrongs done by America? for some reason.

 

It is interesting that you think USA and Iran, Bush and Ahmadinejad are one and the same and should be judged with the same standard.

 

Off-topic I was on an IM with Mike today and his account was hacked so it is currently turned off by the mods until it can be fixed. Mike is enjoying his much saved time not being on DP.

 

I LEAVE MY NAME ON REPS (ASK AGS) AND IF IT WASN'T IMPORTANT TO YOU THEN WHY POST ABOUT YOUR REDS LOL NOW GO AND DIE A THOUSAND TIMES. DO YOU LIKE MY BOLD CAP LOCK TEXT?

BTW I JUST REPORTED YOUR POST, AS IT WAS UNCALLED FOR & I WILL REP REP YOU FOR GOOD MEASURE (NOT THAT YOUR BOTHERED).

So it's one rule for one president but not the other. So you won't be supporting peace or democracy with regard to Ahmadinejad who has the most abuses under his belt?

I was right when i said this:

 

yes it is, don't you wish you could do the same?

 

Iran is not a democratic country, it routinely uses force against it's own citizens. USA on the other hand is a republic which is supposedly has a functioning system of government controlled by laws. What are you cheering for, the day that Bush can use the military like Ahmadinejad to shoot his oppositions?

The interesting thing is that while Iran routinely uses force against people who oppose the government, they usually charge people that are arrested, so they can have the appearance of the rule of law for their government while USA is supporting a lawless system.

 

Constitution states that the president is the Commander in Chief of the military...always has...so yes, Bush can use the military. It is his elected right to do so. Sounds like you have more beef with the constitution than the office of President. You actually sound like Nancy P, she actually wants that power almost as much as shrillary.